| Signal | Nemotron 3 Super (free) | Delta | R1 Distill Qwen 32B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | +17 | |
Pricing | 30 | +30 | |
Context window size | 86 | +14 | |
Recency | 100 | +44 | |
Output Capacity | 90 | +15 | |
| Overall Result | 5 wins | of 5 | 0 wins |
30
days higher
0
days
0
days higher
NVIDIA
DeepSeek
Nemotron 3 Super (free) saves you $43.50/month
That's $522.00/year compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Super (free) | R1 Distill Qwen 32B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 84 | 60 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Rank | #48 | #231 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Quality Rank | #48 | #231 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Adoption Rank | #48 | #231 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Parameters | 120B | 32B | -- |
| Context Window | 262K | 33K | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Pricing | Free | $0.29/$0.29/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 50 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Pricing | 30 | 0 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Context window size | 86 | 72 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Recency | 100 | 56 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
| Output Capacity | 90 | 75 | Nemotron 3 Super (free) |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 84/100 (rank #48), placing it in the top 84% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 60/100 (rank #231), placing it in the top 21% of all 290 models tracked.
Nemotron 3 Super (free) has a 24-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Compare the cost per quality point to find the best value for your specific workload.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Nemotron 3 Super (free) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (84/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Nemotron 3 Super (free) clearly outperforms R1 Distill Qwen 32B with a significant 24.199999999999996-point lead. For most general use cases, Nemotron 3 Super (free) is the stronger choice. However, R1 Distill Qwen 32B may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Nemotron 3 Super (free)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nemotron 3 Super (free)
100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Nemotron 3 Super (free)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Nemotron 3 Super (free)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Nemotron 3 Super (free)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by NVIDIA
| Capability | Nemotron 3 Super (free) | R1 Distill Qwen 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
NVIDIA
DeepSeek
Nemotron 3 Super (free) saves you $0.8700/month
That's 100% cheaper than R1 Distill Qwen 32B at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Nemotron 3 Super (free) | R1 Distill Qwen 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 262K | 33K |
| Max Output Tokens | 262,144 | 32,768 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Mar 11, 2026 | Jan 29, 2025 |
Nemotron 3 Super (free) scores 84/100 (rank #48) compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 60/100 (rank #231), giving it a 24-point advantage. Nemotron 3 Super (free) is the stronger overall choice, though R1 Distill Qwen 32B may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Nemotron 3 Super (free) is ranked #48 and R1 Distill Qwen 32B is ranked #231 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Nemotron 3 Super (free) is cheaper at $0.00/M output tokens vs R1 Distill Qwen 32B's $0.29/M output tokens - 290.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: Nemotron 3 Super (free) at $0.00/M vs R1 Distill Qwen 32B at $0.29/M.
Nemotron 3 Super (free) has a larger context window of 262,144 tokens compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 32,768 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.