Skip to content

AI微调价格对比

微调让您在自己的数据上训练已有的AI模型,使其专门针对您的领域、格式或任务 - 比较所有主要服务商的训练和推理成本。

对比模型数

14

最便宜的训练

$0.48/M tokens

免费训练

2 models

按模型的微调价格
提供商模型训练 $/百万推理输入 $/百万推理输出 $/百万最少示例托管
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash免费$0.10$0.40100Managed
GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash免费$0.075$0.30100Managed
Together AILlama 3.1 8B$0.48$0.18$0.181Managed
FireworksLlama 3.1 8B$0.50$0.20$0.201Managed + Self-host
MistralMistral Small$2.00$0.10$0.301Managed
CohereCommand R$2.00$0.15$0.602Managed
OpenAIGPT-4o Mini$3.00$0.30$1.2010Managed
Together AILlama 3.1 70B$3.50$0.88$0.881Managed
FireworksLlama 3.1 70B$4.00$0.90$0.901Managed + Self-host
CohereCommand R+$5.00$2.50$10.002Managed
MistralMistral Medium$6.00$2.50$7.501Managed
OpenAIGPT-3.5 Turbo$8.00$3.00$6.0010Managed
Together AILlama 3.1 405B$8.00$5.00$5.001Managed
OpenAIGPT-4o$25.00$3.75$15.0010Managed
微调 vs 提示词工程
因素微调提示词工程
设置时间数小时到数天(数据准备+训练)数分钟到数小时
前期成本训练Token成本(见上表)
每请求成本较低(所需提示词更短)较高(需要长系统提示+少样本示例)
迭代速度慢(每次更改需重新训练)快(编辑提示词并测试)
最适用于一致的格式化、领域专业知识、生产工作负载原型设计、通用任务、低使用量
数据要求需要精心整理的训练示例无需训练数据
何时微调有意义

微调的好理由

  • +您的提示词持续冗长且重复,推高了推理成本
  • +您需要基础模型难以维持的特定输出格式
  • +您有特定领域的术语或风格要求
  • +高流量生产环境中,每令牌的节省会累积
  • +您希望通过消除冗长的少样本示例来获得更快的响应速度

何时避免微调

  • -您仍在尝试提示词,尚未确定稳定的用例
  • -提示词工程或检索增强生成(RAG)已经运行良好
  • -您的高质量训练示例不足50条
  • -您的任务经常变化,需要频繁重新训练
  • -请求量低,训练成本无法收回
如何估算微调投资回报率

微调有前期训练成本,但可以通过缩短提示词来降低持续推理成本。要估算微调是否值得:

  1. 测量当前提示词长度。 计算系统提示和少样本示例中的令牌数。典型的少样本提示可能每次请求使用500-2,000个令牌。
  2. 估算微调后的提示词长度。 微调后的模型通常可以完全去掉少样本示例,将输入减少到仅用户查询(50-200个令牌)。
  3. 计算每次请求的令牌节省。 将节省的输入令牌数乘以每令牌输入价格。
  4. 计算盈亏平衡量。 将总训练成本除以每次请求的节省。例如,如果训练成本为50美元,每次请求节省0.005美元,那么在10,000次请求后即可收回成本。

对于月请求量超过10,000次的大多数生产应用,微调通常在第一个月内即可收回成本。

Frequently Asked Questions

Fine-tuning is the process of training a pre-trained language model on your own dataset to specialize it for a specific task, domain, or output style. Instead of training from scratch, you adapt an existing model using examples of the inputs and outputs you want.

OpenAI charges $25.00 per million training tokens for GPT-4o fine-tuning. After training, inference costs $3.75 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens. You need a minimum of 10 training examples, though OpenAI recommends 50-100 for best results.

Yes, Google currently offers free training for Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 1.5 Flash fine-tuning. You only pay for inference after training. However, Google requires a minimum of 100 training examples, which is higher than most other providers.

The minimum varies by provider: Together AI and Fireworks require just 1 example, Cohere requires 2, OpenAI requires 10, and Google requires 100. In practice, most fine-tuning jobs benefit from at least 50-100 high-quality examples, with diminishing returns above 1,000.

For zero training cost, Google Gemini models offer free fine-tuning. For open-source models, Together AI offers Llama 3.1 8B training at $0.48 per million tokens, making it the cheapest paid option. Fireworks also offers competitive pricing with the added benefit of self-hosting your fine-tuned model.

Use prompt engineering first -- it requires no upfront cost and is easy to iterate on. Fine-tuning makes sense when you need consistent formatting, domain-specific behavior, lower per-request latency, or when your prompts are getting too long and expensive. Fine-tuning can actually reduce inference costs by removing the need for lengthy system prompts.

Yes, but options vary by provider. Fireworks explicitly supports both managed hosting and self-hosting of fine-tuned models. Open-source models (Llama, Mistral) fine-tuned through Together AI or Fireworks can typically be exported and self-hosted. OpenAI and Google fine-tuned models can only run on their respective platforms.