AI微调价格对比
微调让您在自己的数据上训练已有的AI模型,使其专门针对您的领域、格式或任务 - 比较所有主要服务商的训练和推理成本。
对比模型数
14
最便宜的训练
$0.48/M tokens
免费训练
2 models
| 提供商 | 模型 | 训练 $/百万 | 推理输入 $/百万 | 推理输出 $/百万 | 最少示例 | 托管 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | 免费 | $0.10 | $0.40 | 100 | Managed | |
| Gemini 1.5 Flash | 免费 | $0.075 | $0.30 | 100 | Managed | |
| Together AI | Llama 3.1 8B | $0.48 | $0.18 | $0.18 | 1 | Managed |
| Fireworks | Llama 3.1 8B | $0.50 | $0.20 | $0.20 | 1 | Managed + Self-host |
| Mistral | Mistral Small | $2.00 | $0.10 | $0.30 | 1 | Managed |
| Cohere | Command R | $2.00 | $0.15 | $0.60 | 2 | Managed |
| OpenAI | GPT-4o Mini | $3.00 | $0.30 | $1.20 | 10 | Managed |
| Together AI | Llama 3.1 70B | $3.50 | $0.88 | $0.88 | 1 | Managed |
| Fireworks | Llama 3.1 70B | $4.00 | $0.90 | $0.90 | 1 | Managed + Self-host |
| Cohere | Command R+ | $5.00 | $2.50 | $10.00 | 2 | Managed |
| Mistral | Mistral Medium | $6.00 | $2.50 | $7.50 | 1 | Managed |
| OpenAI | GPT-3.5 Turbo | $8.00 | $3.00 | $6.00 | 10 | Managed |
| Together AI | Llama 3.1 405B | $8.00 | $5.00 | $5.00 | 1 | Managed |
| OpenAI | GPT-4o | $25.00 | $3.75 | $15.00 | 10 | Managed |
| 因素 | 微调 | 提示词工程 |
|---|---|---|
| 设置时间 | 数小时到数天(数据准备+训练) | 数分钟到数小时 |
| 前期成本 | 训练Token成本(见上表) | 无 |
| 每请求成本 | 较低(所需提示词更短) | 较高(需要长系统提示+少样本示例) |
| 迭代速度 | 慢(每次更改需重新训练) | 快(编辑提示词并测试) |
| 最适用于 | 一致的格式化、领域专业知识、生产工作负载 | 原型设计、通用任务、低使用量 |
| 数据要求 | 需要精心整理的训练示例 | 无需训练数据 |
微调的好理由
- +您的提示词持续冗长且重复,推高了推理成本
- +您需要基础模型难以维持的特定输出格式
- +您有特定领域的术语或风格要求
- +高流量生产环境中,每令牌的节省会累积
- +您希望通过消除冗长的少样本示例来获得更快的响应速度
何时避免微调
- -您仍在尝试提示词,尚未确定稳定的用例
- -提示词工程或检索增强生成(RAG)已经运行良好
- -您的高质量训练示例不足50条
- -您的任务经常变化,需要频繁重新训练
- -请求量低,训练成本无法收回
微调有前期训练成本,但可以通过缩短提示词来降低持续推理成本。要估算微调是否值得:
- 测量当前提示词长度。 计算系统提示和少样本示例中的令牌数。典型的少样本提示可能每次请求使用500-2,000个令牌。
- 估算微调后的提示词长度。 微调后的模型通常可以完全去掉少样本示例,将输入减少到仅用户查询(50-200个令牌)。
- 计算每次请求的令牌节省。 将节省的输入令牌数乘以每令牌输入价格。
- 计算盈亏平衡量。 将总训练成本除以每次请求的节省。例如,如果训练成本为50美元,每次请求节省0.005美元,那么在10,000次请求后即可收回成本。
对于月请求量超过10,000次的大多数生产应用,微调通常在第一个月内即可收回成本。
Fine-tuning is the process of training a pre-trained language model on your own dataset to specialize it for a specific task, domain, or output style. Instead of training from scratch, you adapt an existing model using examples of the inputs and outputs you want.
OpenAI charges $25.00 per million training tokens for GPT-4o fine-tuning. After training, inference costs $3.75 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens. You need a minimum of 10 training examples, though OpenAI recommends 50-100 for best results.
Yes, Google currently offers free training for Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 1.5 Flash fine-tuning. You only pay for inference after training. However, Google requires a minimum of 100 training examples, which is higher than most other providers.
The minimum varies by provider: Together AI and Fireworks require just 1 example, Cohere requires 2, OpenAI requires 10, and Google requires 100. In practice, most fine-tuning jobs benefit from at least 50-100 high-quality examples, with diminishing returns above 1,000.
For zero training cost, Google Gemini models offer free fine-tuning. For open-source models, Together AI offers Llama 3.1 8B training at $0.48 per million tokens, making it the cheapest paid option. Fireworks also offers competitive pricing with the added benefit of self-hosting your fine-tuned model.
Use prompt engineering first -- it requires no upfront cost and is easy to iterate on. Fine-tuning makes sense when you need consistent formatting, domain-specific behavior, lower per-request latency, or when your prompts are getting too long and expensive. Fine-tuning can actually reduce inference costs by removing the need for lengthy system prompts.
Yes, but options vary by provider. Fireworks explicitly supports both managed hosting and self-hosting of fine-tuned models. Open-source models (Llama, Mistral) fine-tuned through Together AI or Fireworks can typically be exported and self-hosted. OpenAI and Google fine-tuned models can only run on their respective platforms.