CursorBench (Multi-file Editing) 排行榜
Evaluates AI coding assistants on real-world multi-file editing tasks across diverse codebases. Tests the ability to understand project context and make coordinated changes.
为什么重要： The first benchmark designed specifically for agentic coding assistants that edit multiple files. More realistic than single-function benchmarks like HumanEval.
顶级模型
61.3%
Composer 2
平均评分
61.3%
共1个模型
已测试模型
1
指标: pass rate
人类基准
-
评分范围: 0%–100%
CursorBench Scores - Top 1 Models
Ranked by CursorBench score (%)
模型排名
All models with a reported CursorBench score, ranked by highest pass rate.
关于 CursorBench
- 全名
- CursorBench (Multi-file Editing)
- 类别
- Coding
- 指标
- pass rate (%)
- 评分范围
- 0%–100%
- 人类基准
- 尚未确定
- 状态
- 启用
CursorBench is a standardized evaluation that measures AI model performance on specific tasks. It provides comparable scores across different models, helping developers choose the right model for their needs.
Composer 2 currently holds the top score on the CursorBench benchmark. See our full rankings table above for the complete leaderboard with 1 models.
We update benchmark data from multiple sources including HuggingFace open-source model leaderboards and LMArena. Scores are refreshed regularly as new evaluations are published and new models are released.
No. While CursorBench is an important indicator, real-world performance depends on many factors including pricing, latency, context window, and specific task requirements. We recommend using our composite score which weighs multiple benchmarks and practical factors.