Skip to content

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5 (Fast)

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic

97#1
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalClaude Fable 5DeltaClaude Opus 5 (Fast)
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
96
+96
0
Pricing
50
--
50
Context window size
95
--
95
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
85
--
85
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
0 wins
Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (8 data points)
Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 (Fast)
Claude Fable 5

97.1

current score

Leader

Claude Fable 5

right now

Claude Opus 5 (Fast)

95.1

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic

Per request$0.035000
Daily$116.67
Monthly$3500.00
Annual$42000.00

Claude Opus 5 (Fast)

Anthropic

Per request$0.035000
Daily$116.67
Monthly$3500.00
Annual$42000.00
Claude Fable 5 pricing:
Input:$10.00/M tokens
Output:$50.00/M tokens
Claude Opus 5 (Fast) pricing:
Input:$10.00/M tokens
Output:$50.00/M tokens
Winner
Claude Fable 5

Anthropic

97

Composite Score

Claude Opus 5 (Fast)

Anthropic

95

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricClaude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 (Fast)Winner
Overall Score
97
95
Claude Fable 5
Rank#1#2
Claude Fable 5
Quality Rank#1#2
Claude Fable 5
Adoption Rank#1#2
Claude Fable 5
Parameters------
Context Window1000K1000K--
Pricing$10.00/$50.00/M$10.00/$50.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
Claude Fable 5
Benchmarks
96
--
Claude Fable 5
Pricing
50
50
Claude Fable 5
Context window size
95
95
Claude Fable 5
Recency
100
100
Claude Fable 5
Output Capacity
85
85
Claude Fable 5
Benchmark Head-to-Head(4 benchmarks)
Claude Fable: 0Claude Opus: 0
Claude Fable
Claude Opus
Normalized 0-100%
GPQA Diamond
94.1%-
SWE-bench Verified
95%-
Arena Elo
1508-
HLE
59%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Claude Fable 5Elite Tier

Scores 97/100 (rank #1), placing it in the top 100% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Claude Opus 5 (Fast)Elite Tier

Scores 95/100 (rank #2), placing it in the top 100% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 2-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Fable 5 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Claude Opus 5 (Fast) when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Claude Fable 5Best Value
Input cost$10.00/M tokens
Output cost$50.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.618
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$900.00
Claude Opus 5 (Fast)
Input cost$10.00/M tokens
Output cost$50.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.631
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$900.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Claude Fable 5Faster
Speed score0/100
Claude Opus 5 (Fast)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Claude Fable 5

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Claude Fable 5 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Claude Fable 5

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Claude Fable 5

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($50.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Claude Fable 5

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (97/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Claude Fable 5

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Claude Fable 5
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 5 (Fast) are extremely close in overall performance (only 2 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Claude Fable 5
Recommended

by Anthropic

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 0% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Anthropic

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityClaude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 (Fast)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic

$78.00
estimated monthly cost

Claude Opus 5 (Fast)

Anthropic

$78.00
estimated monthly cost

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterClaude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 (Fast)
Context Window1M1M
Max Output Tokens128,000128,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJun 9, 2026Jul 24, 2026
Last updated: 10m ago

相关对比

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5 (Fast) (2026) | LM Market Cap