Skip to content

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Gemini 4 Argon (batch)

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek

72#107
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalDeepSeek V3 0324DeltaGemini 4 Argon (batch)
Capabilities
50
-50
100
Benchmarks
72
+72
0
Pricing
99
+4
95
Context window size
83
-13
96
Recency
25
-75
100
Output Capacity
81
-15
96
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
4 wins
Gemini 4 Argon (batch) wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (38 data points)
DeepSeek V3 0324Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
DeepSeek V3 0324

71.8

current score

Leader

DeepSeek V3 0324

right now

Gemini 4 Argon (batch)

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.000860
Daily$2.87
Monthly$86.00
Annual$1032.00

Gemini 4 Argon (batch)

Google

Per request$0.003500
Daily$11.67
Monthly$350.00
Annual$4200.00

DeepSeek V3 0324 saves you $264.00/month

That's $3168.00/year compared to Gemini 4 Argon (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

75% cheaper
Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 for cost optimization

DeepSeek V3 0324 pricing:
Input:$0.29/M tokens
Output:$1.14/M tokens
Gemini 4 Argon (batch) pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$5.00/M tokens
Winner
DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek

72

Composite Score

Gemini 4 Argon (batch)

Google

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricDeepSeek V3 0324Gemini 4 Argon (batch)Winner
Overall Score
72
40
DeepSeek V3 0324
Rank#107#203
DeepSeek V3 0324
Quality Rank#107#203
DeepSeek V3 0324
Adoption Rank#107#203
DeepSeek V3 0324
Parameters------
Context Window164K1049K
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Pricing$0.29/$1.14/M$1.00/$5.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
100
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Benchmarks
72
--
DeepSeek V3 0324
Pricing
99
95
DeepSeek V3 0324
Context window size
83
96
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Recency
25
100
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Output Capacity
81
96
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(10 benchmarks)
DeepSeek V3: 0Gemini 4: 0
DeepSeek V3
Gemini 4
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
89.2%-
MMLU-Pro
77.5%-
GPQA Diamond
62.5%-
MATH-500
92%-
HumanEval
84.5%-
IFEval
89%-
BBH
88%-
Arena Elo
1345-
LiveBench
53.3%-
BigCodeBench
27.7%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

DeepSeek V3 0324Strong Performer

Scores 72/100 (rank #107), placing it in the top 63% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #203), placing it in the top 30% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

DeepSeek V3 0324 has a 32-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Gemini 4 Argon (batch) when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
DeepSeek V3 0324Best Value
Input cost$0.29/M tokens
Output cost$1.14/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.020
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$21.45
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$5.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.150
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$90.00

DeepSeek V3 0324 offers 76% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $21.45/month with DeepSeek V3 0324 vs $90.00/month with Gemini 4 Argon (batch) - a $68.55 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
DeepSeek V3 0324Faster
Speed score0/100
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

DeepSeek V3 0324

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. DeepSeek V3 0324 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

DeepSeek V3 0324

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Gemini 4 Argon (batch)

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($1.14/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

DeepSeek V3 0324

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (72/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

DeepSeek V3 0324

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324 clearly outperforms Gemini 4 Argon (batch) with a significant 31.799999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, DeepSeek V3 0324 is the stronger choice. However, Gemini 4 Argon (batch) may still excel in niche scenarios.

DeepSeek V3 0324
Recommended

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 76% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Google

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek

Best Value
$1.89
estimated monthly cost

Gemini 4 Argon (batch)

Google

$7.80
estimated monthly cost

DeepSeek V3 0324 saves you $5.91/month

That's 76% cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterDeepSeek V3 0324Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Context Window164K1.0M
Max Output Tokens115,200943,718
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedMar 24, 2025Oct 13, 2026
Last updated: 48m ago

相关对比

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Gemini 4 Argon (batch) (2026) | LM Market Cap