| Signal | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Delta | Devstral 2 2512 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | +17 | |
Benchmarks | 81 | +81 | |
Pricing | 1 | -1 | |
Context window size | 83 | -3 | |
Recency | 65 | -35 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
28
days higher
0
days
2
days higher
DeepSeek
Mistral AI
DeepSeek V3 0324 saves you $81.50/month
That's $978.00/year compared to Devstral 2 2512 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Devstral 2 2512 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 73 | 68 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
| Rank | #133 | #178 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
| Quality Rank | #133 | #178 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
| Adoption Rank | #133 | #178 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 164K | 262K | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Pricing | $0.20/$0.77/M | $0.40/$2.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 50 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
| Benchmarks | 81 | -- | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
| Pricing | 1 | 2 | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Context window size | 83 | 86 | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Recency | 65 | 100 | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 20 | DeepSeek V3 0324 |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 73/100 (rank #133), placing it in the top 54% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 68/100 (rank #178), placing it in the top 39% of all 290 models tracked.
DeepSeek V3 0324 has a 5-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
DeepSeek V3 0324 offers 60% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $14.55/month with DeepSeek V3 0324 vs $36.00/month with Devstral 2 2512 - a $21.45 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. DeepSeek V3 0324 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.77/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (73/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
DeepSeek V3 0324 has a moderate advantage with a 5.299999999999997-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Devstral 2 2512 has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
DeepSeek V3 0324
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
DeepSeek V3 0324
60% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
DeepSeek V3 0324
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
DeepSeek V3 0324
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
DeepSeek V3 0324
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by DeepSeek
| Capability | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Devstral 2 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
DeepSeek
Mistral AI
DeepSeek V3 0324 saves you $1.84/month
That's 59% cheaper than Devstral 2 2512 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Devstral 2 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 164K | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | -- |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Mar 24, 2025 | Dec 9, 2025 |
DeepSeek V3 0324 scores 73/100 (rank #133) compared to Devstral 2 2512's 68/100 (rank #178), giving it a 5-point advantage. DeepSeek V3 0324 is the stronger overall choice, though Devstral 2 2512 may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
DeepSeek V3 0324 is ranked #133 and Devstral 2 2512 is ranked #178 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper at $0.77/M output tokens vs Devstral 2 2512's $2.00/M output tokens - 2.6x more expensive. Input token pricing: DeepSeek V3 0324 at $0.20/M vs Devstral 2 2512 at $0.40/M.
Devstral 2 2512 has a larger context window of 262,144 tokens compared to DeepSeek V3 0324's 163,840 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.