Skip to content

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsDeltaNemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Capabilities
100
+50
50
Benchmarks
92
+92
0
Pricing
88
-12
100
Context window size
96
+14
81
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
80
+15
65
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
1 wins
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsNemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

92.2

current score

Leader

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

right now

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Google

Per request$0.008000
Daily$26.67
Monthly$800.00
Annual$9600.00

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)

NVIDIA

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) saves you $800.00/month

That's $9600.00/year compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) for cost optimization

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$12.00/M tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
Winner
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Google

92

Composite Score

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)

NVIDIA

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsNemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)Winner
Overall Score
92
40
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Rank#15#255
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Quality Rank#15#255
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Adoption Rank#15#255
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Parameters------
Context Window1049K128K
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Pricing$2.00/$12.00/MFree--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
50
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Benchmarks
92
--
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Pricing
88
100
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Context window size
96
81
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Recency
100
100
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Output Capacity
80
65
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Benchmark Head-to-Head(5 benchmarks)
Gemini 3.1: 0Nemotron 3.5: 0
Gemini 3.1
Nemotron 3.5
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.6%-
MMLU-Pro
91.2%-
GPQA Diamond
94.3%-
SWE-bench Verified
80.6%-
Arena Elo
1494-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsElite Tier

Scores 92/100 (rank #15), placing it in the top 95% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #255), placing it in the top 12% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has a 52-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$12.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.152
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$210.00
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsFaster
Speed score0/100
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (92/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools clearly outperforms Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) with a significant 52.2-point lead. For most general use cases, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is the stronger choice. However, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Google

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by NVIDIA

  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsNemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Google

$18.00
estimated monthly cost

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)

NVIDIA

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) saves you $18.00/month

That's 100% cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsNemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Context Window1.0M128K
Max Output Tokens65,5368,192
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedFeb 25, 2026Jun 4, 2026
Last updated: 21m ago

相关对比

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) (2026) | LM Market Cap