Skip to content

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Sora

vs
Sora

OpenAI

5#6
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGemini Omni 1.2 FlashDeltaSora
Capabilities
100
+100
0
Pricing
91
-9
100
Context window size
100
+100
0
Recency
100
+94
6
Output Capacity
100
+80
20
Overall Result
4 wins
of 5
1 wins
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash wins 4 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (36 data points)
Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashSora
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

40

current score

Leader

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

right now

Sora

4.5

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Google

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

Sora

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Sora saves you $600.00/month

That's $7200.00/year compared to Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Sora for cost optimization

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash pricing:
Input:$1.50/M tokens
Output:$9.00/M tokens
Sora pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
Winner
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Google

40

Composite Score

Sora

OpenAI

5

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGemini Omni 1.2 FlashSoraWinner
Overall Score
40
5
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Rank#1#6
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Quality Rank#1#6
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Adoption Rank#1#6
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Parameters------
Context Window131K----
Pricing$1.50/$9.00/MFree--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
0
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Pricing
91
100
Sora
Context window size
100
0
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Recency
100
6
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Output Capacity
100
20
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #1), placing it in the top 100% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
SoraLimited

Scores 5/100 (rank #6), placing it in the top 98% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash has a 36-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (131K token context)
  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Sora when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
Cost-Performance Analysis
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Input cost$1.50/M tokens
Output cost$9.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.263
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$157.50
Sora
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashFaster
Speed score0/100
Sora
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Sora also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Long document analysis

Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Sora

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash clearly outperforms Sora with a significant 35.5-point lead. For most general use cases, Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is the stronger choice. However, Sora may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Google

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGemini Omni 1.2 FlashSora
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streamingdiffers
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Google

$13.50
estimated monthly cost

Sora

OpenAI

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Sora saves you $13.50/month

That's 100% cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGemini Omni 1.2 FlashSora
Context Window131K--
Max Output Tokens65,536--
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedNov 5, 2026Dec 9, 2024
Last updated: 5m ago

相关对比

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Sora (2026) | LM Market Cap