Skip to content

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Max

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI

89#24
vs
Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

80#55
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-5.6 TerraDeltaQwen3.8 Max
Capabilities
100
+17
83
Benchmarks
88
+8
80
Pricing
94
--
94
Context window size
96
+0
95
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
85
0
85
Overall Result
3 wins
of 6
1 wins
GPT-5.6 Terra wins 3 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (5 data points)
GPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.8 Max
GPT-5.6 Terra

89

current score

Leader

GPT-5.6 Terra

right now

Qwen3.8 Max

80.4

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.004000
Daily$13.33
Monthly$400.00
Annual$4800.00

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

GPT-5.6 Terra saves you $100.00/month

That's $1200.00/year compared to Qwen3.8 Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

20% cheaper
Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for cost optimization

GPT-5.6 Terra pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Qwen3.8 Max pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Winner
GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI

89

Composite Score

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

80

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.8 MaxWinner
Overall Score
89
80
GPT-5.6 Terra
Rank#24#55
GPT-5.6 Terra
Quality Rank#24#55
GPT-5.6 Terra
Adoption Rank#24#55
GPT-5.6 Terra
Parameters------
Context Window1050K1000K
GPT-5.6 Terra
Pricing$1.00/$6.00/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
83
GPT-5.6 Terra
Benchmarks
88
80
GPT-5.6 Terra
Pricing
94
94
GPT-5.6 Terra
Context window size
96
95
GPT-5.6 Terra
Recency
100
100
GPT-5.6 Terra
Output Capacity
85
85
Qwen3.8 Max
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
GPT-5.6 Terra: 0Qwen3.8 Max: 1
GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3.8 Max
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
93%-
MMLU-Pro
84.5%-
GPQA Diamond
85%-
MATH-500
92.5%-
HumanEval
96.5%-
SWE-bench Verified
75%-
IFEval
92%-
BBH
90.5%-
Arena Elo
14651496
LiveBench
76%-
HLE
35%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-5.6 TerraElite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #24), placing it in the top 92% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3.8 MaxStrong Performer

Scores 80/100 (rank #55), placing it in the top 81% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

GPT-5.6 Terra has a 9-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Qwen3.8 Max when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-5.6 TerraBest Value
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.079
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$105.00
Qwen3.8 Max
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.100
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

GPT-5.6 Terra offers 13% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $105.00/month with GPT-5.6 Terra vs $120.00/month with Qwen3.8 Max - a $15.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
GPT-5.6 TerraFaster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3.8 Max
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-5.6 Terra

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-5.6 Terra also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-5.6 Terra

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1050K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

GPT-5.6 Terra

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($6.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

GPT-5.6 Terra

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GPT-5.6 Terra

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-5.6 Terra
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra has a moderate advantage with a 8.599999999999994-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Qwen3.8 Max has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

GPT-5.6 Terra
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 13% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.8 Max
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI

Best Value
$9.00
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

GPT-5.6 Terra saves you $1.80/month

That's 17% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.8 Max
Context Window1.1M1M
Max Output Tokens128,000131,072
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJul 9, 2026Aug 3, 2026
Last updated: 52m ago

相关对比

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Max (2026) | LM Market Cap