GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) vs Mistral Nemo
| Signal | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) | Delta | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +50 | |
Pricing | 98 | -2 | |
Context window size | 96 | +14 | |
Recency | 100 | +100 | |
Output Capacity | 82 | +14 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 5 | 1 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
OpenAI
Mistral Nemo
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo saves you $170.60/month
That's $2047.20/year compared to GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) | Mistral Nemo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #181 | #413 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Quality Rank | #181 | #413 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Adoption Rank | #181 | #413 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1050K | 131K | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Pricing | $0.50/$2.50/M | $0.03/$0.03/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 50 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Pricing | 98 | 100 | Mistral Nemo |
| Context window size | 96 | 81 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Recency | 100 | 0 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Output Capacity | 82 | 67 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #181), placing it in the top 38% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #413), placing it in the top -42% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1050K token context)
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose Mistral Nemo when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Mistral Nemo offers 98% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $0.89/month with Mistral Nemo vs $45.00/month with GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) - a $44.12 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Mistral Nemo also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1050K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.03/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) and Mistral Nemo are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Mistral Nemo
98% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
OpenAI
Mistral Nemo
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo saves you $3.81/month
That's 98% cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.1M | 131K |
| Max Output Tokens | 128,000 | 16,384 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Oct 26, 2026 | Jul 19, 2024 |