| Signal | Grok 4.1 Fast | Delta | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +33 | |
Benchmarks | 76 | +17 | |
Pricing | 100 | +2 | |
Context window size | 100 | +5 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 75 | -6 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 1 wins |
Score History
78
current score
Grok 4.1 Fast
right now
60.5
current score
xAI
Amazon
Grok 4.1 Fast saves you $110.00/month
That's $1320.00/year compared to Nova 2 Lite at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Grok 4.1 Fast | Nova 2 Lite | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 78 | 61 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Rank | #52 | #148 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Quality Rank | #52 | #148 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Adoption Rank | #52 | #148 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 2000K | 1000K | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Pricing | $0.20/$0.50/M | $0.30/$2.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 67 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Benchmarks | 76 | 58 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Pricing | 100 | 98 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Context window size | 100 | 95 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Output Capacity | 75 | 80 | Nova 2 Lite |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 78/100 (rank #52), placing it in the top 82% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 61/100 (rank #148), placing it in the top 49% of all 290 models tracked.
Grok 4.1 Fast has a 18-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Grok 4.1 Fast offers 75% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $10.50/month with Grok 4.1 Fast vs $42.00/month with Nova 2 Lite - a $31.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok 4.1 Fast also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (2000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (78/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Grok 4.1 Fast clearly outperforms Nova 2 Lite with a significant 17.5-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger choice. However, Nova 2 Lite may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Grok 4.1 Fast
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Grok 4.1 Fast
75% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Grok 4.1 Fast
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Grok 4.1 Fast
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Grok 4.1 Fast
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by xAI
| Capability | Grok 4.1 Fast | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
xAI
Amazon
Grok 4.1 Fast saves you $2.58/month
That's 73% cheaper than Nova 2 Lite at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Grok 4.1 Fast | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 2M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 30,000 | 65,535 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Nov 19, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 |
Grok 4.1 Fast's #1 ranking among 326 coding models reflects its superior performance at 75/100 versus Nova 2 Lite's middling 54/100 score. The performance gap likely stems from Grok's 2x larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens) and exclusive features like JSON mode and web search, which are critical for modern coding workflows where LLMs need to fetch documentation and output structured code.
Grok 4.1 Fast charges $0.50/M output tokens compared to Nova 2 Lite's $2.50/M, making it dramatically cheaper for code generation tasks. This pricing advantage combined with superior performance suggests xAI has achieved better inference efficiency, potentially through architectural optimizations or larger-scale deployment that Amazon hasn't matched with Nova 2 Lite.
With Grok 4.1 Fast ranking 54 positions higher (#1 vs #55) and costing 80% less for output tokens, the performance and cost benefits likely outweigh AWS integration convenience for pure coding workloads. However, Nova 2 Lite's 66K max output tokens versus Grok's 30K could matter for teams generating large codebases or documentation in single requests.
Nova 2 Lite's unique advantages are its 2.2x larger max output capacity (66K vs 30K tokens) and video processing capability, making it suitable for generating extensive code documentation from video tutorials or screen recordings. For teams already committed to AWS Bedrock's ecosystem, the $2.50/M output cost might be acceptable to avoid cross-provider complexity, though the 21-point performance gap remains significant.
Grok 4.1 Fast's web search capability allows it to fetch current API documentation and Stack Overflow solutions in real-time, contributing to its 75/100 score versus Nova 2 Lite's 54/100. Combined with JSON mode for structured output and a 2M token context window for processing large codebases, Grok can handle modern full-stack development workflows that Nova 2 Lite would struggle with despite its video input capability.