| Signal | Grok 4.1 Fast | Delta | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +17 | |
Benchmarks | 76 | +76 | |
Pricing | 100 | +1 | |
Context window size | 100 | +5 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 75 | -6 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 1 wins |
Score History
78.5
current score
Grok 4.1 Fast
right now
40
current score
xAI
Alibaba
Grok 4.1 Fast saves you $85.00/month
That's $1020.00/year compared to Qwen3.6 Plus at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen3.6 Plus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 79 | 40 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Rank | #41 | #170 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Quality Rank | #41 | #170 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Adoption Rank | #41 | #170 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 2000K | 1000K | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Pricing | $0.20/$0.50/M | $0.33/$1.95/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 83 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Benchmarks | 76 | -- | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Pricing | 100 | 98 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Context window size | 100 | 95 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Grok 4.1 Fast |
| Output Capacity | 75 | 80 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 79/100 (rank #41), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #170), placing it in the top 42% of all 290 models tracked.
Grok 4.1 Fast has a 39-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Grok 4.1 Fast offers 69% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $10.50/month with Grok 4.1 Fast vs $34.13/month with Qwen3.6 Plus - a $23.63 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Grok 4.1 Fast also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (2000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (79/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Grok 4.1 Fast clearly outperforms Qwen3.6 Plus with a significant 38.5-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger choice. However, Qwen3.6 Plus may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Grok 4.1 Fast
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Grok 4.1 Fast
69% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Grok 4.1 Fast
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Grok 4.1 Fast
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Grok 4.1 Fast
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by xAI
| Capability | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
xAI
Alibaba
Grok 4.1 Fast saves you $1.96/month
That's 67% cheaper than Qwen3.6 Plus at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 2M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 30,000 | 65,536 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Nov 19, 2025 | Apr 2, 2026 |
Grok 4.1 Fast scores 79/100 (rank #41) compared to Qwen3.6 Plus's 40/100 (rank #170), giving it a 39-point advantage. Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger overall choice, though Qwen3.6 Plus may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Grok 4.1 Fast is ranked #41 and Qwen3.6 Plus is ranked #170 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper at $0.50/M output tokens vs Qwen3.6 Plus's $1.95/M output tokens - 3.9x more expensive. Input token pricing: Grok 4.1 Fast at $0.20/M vs Qwen3.6 Plus at $0.33/M.
Grok 4.1 Fast has a larger context window of 2,000,000 tokens compared to Qwen3.6 Plus's 1,000,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.