| Signal | MiniMax M2-her | Delta | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 17 | -67 | |
Benchmarks | 72 | -1 | |
Pricing | 99 | -- | |
Context window size | 69 | -17 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 55 | -40 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
Score History
68.8
current score
MiniMax M3
right now
74.2
current score
MiniMax
MiniMax
| Metric | MiniMax M2-her | MiniMax M3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69 | 74 | MiniMax M3 |
| Rank | #104 | #72 | MiniMax M3 |
| Quality Rank | #104 | #72 | MiniMax M3 |
| Adoption Rank | #104 | #72 | MiniMax M3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 66K | 1049K | MiniMax M3 |
| Pricing | $0.30/$1.20/M | $0.30/$1.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 17 | 83 | MiniMax M3 |
| Benchmarks | 72 | 73 | MiniMax M3 |
| Pricing | 99 | 99 | MiniMax M2-her |
| Context window size | 69 | 86 | MiniMax M3 |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | MiniMax M2-her |
| Output Capacity | 55 | 95 | MiniMax M3 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 69/100 (rank #104), placing it in the top 64% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 74/100 (rank #72), placing it in the top 76% of all 290 models tracked.
MiniMax M3 has a 5-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. MiniMax M2-her also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (74/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
MiniMax M3 has a moderate advantage with a 5.400000000000006-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but MiniMax M2-her has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
MiniMax M2-her
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
MiniMax M2-her
0% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
MiniMax M2-her
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
MiniMax M2-her
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
MiniMax M2-her
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by MiniMax
| Capability | MiniMax M2-her | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
MiniMax
MiniMax
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | MiniMax M2-her | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 66K | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 2,048 | 512,000 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Jan 23, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |