Skip to content

Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3 Max

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

52#170
vs
Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

67#128
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalKimi K2 0905DeltaQwen3 Max
Capabilities
50
--
50
Benchmarks
51
-18
69
Pricing
98
+1
96
Context window size
86
--
86
Recency
73
-3
77
Output Capacity
83
+8
75
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
2 wins
It's a tie - both models win 2 signals each

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
Kimi K2 0905Qwen3 Max
Kimi K2 0905

52.4

current score

Leader

Qwen3 Max

right now

Qwen3 Max

67.4

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

Best Value
Per request$0.001850
Daily$6.17
Monthly$185.00
Annual$2220.00

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

Per request$0.002730
Daily$9.10
Monthly$273.00
Annual$3276.00

Kimi K2 0905 saves you $88.00/month

That's $1056.00/year compared to Qwen3 Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

32% cheaper
Choose Kimi K2 0905 for cost optimization

Kimi K2 0905 pricing:
Input:$0.60/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
Qwen3 Max pricing:
Input:$0.78/M tokens
Output:$3.90/M tokens
Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

52

Composite Score

Winner
Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

67

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricKimi K2 0905Qwen3 MaxWinner
Overall Score
52
67
Qwen3 Max
Rank#170#128
Qwen3 Max
Quality Rank#170#128
Qwen3 Max
Adoption Rank#170#128
Qwen3 Max
Parameters------
Context Window262K262K--
Pricing$0.60/$2.50/M$0.78/$3.90/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
50
Kimi K2 0905
Benchmarks
51
69
Qwen3 Max
Pricing
98
96
Kimi K2 0905
Context window size
86
86
Kimi K2 0905
Recency
73
77
Qwen3 Max
Output Capacity
83
75
Kimi K2 0905
Benchmark Head-to-Head(2 benchmarks)
Kimi K2: 0Qwen3 Max: 0
Kimi K2
Qwen3 Max
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU-Pro
-85.7%
SWE-bench Verified
63.4%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Kimi K2 0905Competitive

Scores 52/100 (rank #170), placing it in the top 42% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3 MaxCompetitive

Scores 67/100 (rank #128), placing it in the top 56% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Qwen3 Max has a 15-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Kimi K2 0905 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Qwen3 Max when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements
Cost-Performance Analysis
Kimi K2 0905Best Value
Input cost$0.60/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.059
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$46.50
Qwen3 Max
Input cost$0.78/M tokens
Output cost$3.90/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.069
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$70.20

Kimi K2 0905 offers 34% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $46.50/month with Kimi K2 0905 vs $70.20/month with Qwen3 Max - a $23.70 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Kimi K2 0905Faster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3 Max
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Kimi K2 0905

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Kimi K2 0905 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Kimi K2 0905

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Kimi K2 0905

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Kimi K2 0905

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (67/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Qwen3 Max
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max clearly outperforms Kimi K2 0905 with a significant 15.000000000000007-point lead. For most general use cases, Qwen3 Max is the stronger choice. However, Kimi K2 0905 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Moonshot AI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 34% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Qwen3 Max
Recommended

by Alibaba

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityKimi K2 0905Qwen3 Max
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

Best Value
$4.08
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

$6.08
estimated monthly cost

Kimi K2 0905 saves you $2.00/month

That's 33% cheaper than Qwen3 Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterKimi K2 0905Qwen3 Max
Context Window262K262K
Max Output Tokens100,35232,768
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedSep 4, 2025Sep 23, 2025
Last updated: 1h ago

相关对比

Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3 Max (2026) | LM Market Cap