Skip to content

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Grok 4.3

vs
Grok 4.3

xAI

89#33
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalMuse Spark 1.2DeltaGrok 4.3
Capabilities
100
--
100
Pricing
96
-2
98
Context window size
96
+0
95
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
96
+0
95
Benchmarks
0
-81
81
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
2 wins
It's a tie - both models win 2 signals each

Score History

Score History (4 data points)
Muse Spark 1.2Grok 4.3
Muse Spark 1.2

80.6

current score

Leader

Grok 4.3

right now

Grok 4.3

88.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Muse Spark 1.2

meta

Per request$0.003375
Daily$11.25
Monthly$337.50
Annual$4050.00

Grok 4.3

xAI

Best Value
Per request$0.002500
Daily$8.33
Monthly$250.00
Annual$3000.00

Grok 4.3 saves you $87.50/month

That's $1050.00/year compared to Muse Spark 1.2 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

26% cheaper
Choose Grok 4.3 for cost optimization

Muse Spark 1.2 pricing:
Input:$1.25/M tokens
Output:$4.25/M tokens
Grok 4.3 pricing:
Input:$1.25/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
Muse Spark 1.2

meta

81

Composite Score

Winner
Grok 4.3

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricMuse Spark 1.2Grok 4.3Winner
Overall Score
81
89
Grok 4.3
Rank#66#33
Grok 4.3
Quality Rank#66#33
Grok 4.3
Adoption Rank#66#33
Grok 4.3
Parameters------
Context Window1049K1000K
Muse Spark 1.2
Pricing$1.25/$4.25/M$1.25/$2.50/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
Muse Spark 1.2
Pricing
96
98
Grok 4.3
Context window size
96
95
Muse Spark 1.2
Recency
100
100
Muse Spark 1.2
Output Capacity
96
95
Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarks--
81
Grok 4.3
Benchmark Head-to-Head(2 benchmarks)
Muse Spark: 0Grok 4.3: 0
Muse Spark
Grok 4.3
Normalized 0-100%
GPQA Diamond
-90%
Arena Elo
-1446
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Muse Spark 1.2Strong Performer

Scores 81/100 (rank #66), placing it in the top 78% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.3Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #33), placing it in the top 89% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Grok 4.3 has a 8-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Grok 4.3 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Muse Spark 1.2
Input cost$1.25/M tokens
Output cost$4.25/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.068
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$82.50
Grok 4.3Best Value
Input cost$1.25/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.042
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$56.25

Grok 4.3 offers 32% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $56.25/month with Grok 4.3 vs $82.50/month with Muse Spark 1.2 - a $26.25 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Muse Spark 1.2Faster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Muse Spark 1.2

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok 4.3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Muse Spark 1.2

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Muse Spark 1.2

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok 4.3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Muse Spark 1.2
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3 has a moderate advantage with a 8.200000000000003-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Muse Spark 1.2 has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

by meta

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Grok 4.3
Recommended

by xAI

  • Choose for Cost - 32% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityMuse Spark 1.2Grok 4.3
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Muse Spark 1.2

meta

$7.35
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.3

xAI

Best Value
$5.25
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.3 saves you $2.10/month

That's 29% cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterMuse Spark 1.2Grok 4.3
Context Window1.0M1M
Max Output Tokens943,718900,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedAug 5, 2026Apr 30, 2026
Last updated: 39m ago

相关对比

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Grok 4.3 (2026) | LM Market Cap