Skip to content

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)DeltaNano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Capabilities
86
+14
71
Pricing
99
+1
98
Context window size
86
+5
81
Recency
100
+24
76
Output Capacity
94
+18
77
Benchmarks
0
-80
81
Overall Result
5 wins
of 6
1 wins
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (26 data points)
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

22.4

current score

Leader

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

right now

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

76.9

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google

Best Value
Per request$0.001000
Daily$3.33
Monthly$100.00
Annual$1200.00

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google

Per request$0.001550
Daily$5.17
Monthly$155.00
Annual$1860.00

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) saves you $55.00/month

That's $660.00/year compared to Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

35% cheaper
Choose Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) for cost optimization

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) pricing:
Input:$0.25/M tokens
Output:$1.50/M tokens
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) pricing:
Input:$0.30/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Winner
Overall Score
22
77
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Rank#9#4
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Quality Rank#9#4
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Adoption Rank#9#4
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Parameters------
Context Window66K33K
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Pricing$0.25/$1.50/M$0.30/$2.50/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
86
71
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Pricing
99
98
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Context window size
86
81
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Recency
100
76
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Output Capacity
94
77
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Benchmarks--
81
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
Nano Banana: 0Nano Banana: 1
Nano Banana
Nano Banana
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-85.8%
MMLU-Pro
-78%
GPQA Diamond
-82.8%
MATH-500
-85.8%
HumanEval
-90%
SWE-bench Verified
-60.4%
AIME 2024
-88%
IFEval
-85.5%
BBH
-85%
Arena Elo
-1395
LiveBench
-66.5%
HLE
8.64%12.08%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Limited

Scores 22/100 (rank #9), placing it in the top 97% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Strong Performer

Scores 77/100 (rank #4), placing it in the top 99% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has a 55-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (66K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) when you need:

  • General-purpose tasks across coding, writing, and analysis
Cost-Performance Analysis
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Input cost$0.25/M tokens
Output cost$1.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.078
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$26.25
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Best Value
Input cost$0.30/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.036
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$42.00

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) offers 37% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $26.25/month with Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs $42.00/month with Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) - a $15.75 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Faster
Speed score0/100
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Long document analysis

Larger context window (66K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($1.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (77/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) clearly outperforms Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) with a significant 54.50000000000001-point lead. For most general use cases, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is the stronger choice. However, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Google

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 37% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Google

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google

Best Value
$2.25
estimated monthly cost

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google

$3.54
estimated monthly cost

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) saves you $1.29/month

That's 36% cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Context Window66K33K
Max Output Tokens66,0008,192
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJun 30, 2026Oct 7, 2025
Last updated: 54m ago

相关对比

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) (2026) | LM Market Cap