Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs Fugu Ultra
| Signal | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) | Delta | Fugu Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | -- | |
Pricing | 88 | +18 | |
Context window size | 86 | +0 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 88 | +3 | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 5 | 0 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Fugu Ultra
sakana
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) saves you $1200.00/month
That's $14400.00/year compared to Fugu Ultra at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) | Fugu Ultra | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #6 | #172 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Quality Rank | #6 | #172 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Adoption Rank | #6 | #172 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 66K | 1000K | Fugu Ultra |
| Pricing | $2.00/$12.00/M | $5.00/$30.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 100 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Pricing | 88 | 70 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Context window size | 86 | 86 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Output Capacity | 88 | 85 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #6), placing it in the top 98% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #172), placing it in the top 41% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose Fugu Ultra when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) offers 60% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $210.00/month with Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs $525.00/month with Fugu Ultra - a $315.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($12.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Fugu Ultra are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
60% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 60% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) | Fugu Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Outputdiffers |
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Fugu Ultra
sakana
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) saves you $27.00/month
That's 60% cheaper than Fugu Ultra at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) | Fugu Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 66K | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 32,768 | 128,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Jun 18, 2026 | Jun 24, 2026 |