Skip to content

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Fugu Max

Nova Premier 1.0

Amazon

40#351
vs
Fugu Max

sakana

40#248
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalNova Premier 1.0DeltaFugu Max
Capabilities
50
-50
100
Pricing
88
-6
94
Context window size
95
--
95
Recency
74
-26
100
Output Capacity
72
-10
82
Overall Result
0 wins
of 5
4 wins
Fugu Max wins 4 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (32 data points)
Nova Premier 1.0Fugu Max
Nova Premier 1.0

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Fugu Max

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Nova Premier 1.0

Amazon

Per request$0.008750
Daily$29.17
Monthly$875.00
Annual$10500.00

Fugu Max

sakana

Best Value
Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Fugu Max saves you $375.00/month

That's $4500.00/year compared to Nova Premier 1.0 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

43% cheaper
Choose Fugu Max for cost optimization

Nova Premier 1.0 pricing:
Input:$2.50/M tokens
Output:$12.50/M tokens
Fugu Max pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Tie
Nova Premier 1.0

Amazon

40

Composite Score

Tie
Fugu Max

sakana

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricNova Premier 1.0Fugu MaxWinner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#351#248
Fugu Max
Quality Rank#351#248
Fugu Max
Adoption Rank#351#248
Fugu Max
Parameters------
Context Window1000K1000K--
Pricing$2.50/$12.50/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
100
Fugu Max
Pricing
88
94
Fugu Max
Context window size
95
95
Nova Premier 1.0
Recency
74
100
Fugu Max
Output Capacity
72
82
Fugu Max
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Nova Premier 1.0Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #351), placing it in the top -21% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Fugu MaxEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #248), placing it in the top 15% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Nova Premier 1.0 when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements

Choose Fugu Max when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Nova Premier 1.0
Input cost$2.50/M tokens
Output cost$12.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.375
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$225.00
Fugu MaxBest Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.200
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

Fugu Max offers 47% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $120.00/month with Fugu Max vs $225.00/month with Nova Premier 1.0 - a $105.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Nova Premier 1.0Faster
Speed score0/100
Fugu Max
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Nova Premier 1.0

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Fugu Max also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Nova Premier 1.0

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Nova Premier 1.0

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($6.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Fugu Max

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Nova Premier 1.0

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Nova Premier 1.0
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Nova Premier 1.0

Nova Premier 1.0 and Fugu Max are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Nova Premier 1.0
Recommended

by Amazon

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by sakana

  • Choose for Cost - 47% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityNova Premier 1.0Fugu Max
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoningdiffers
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Nova Premier 1.0

Amazon

$19.50
estimated monthly cost

Fugu Max

sakana

Best Value
$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Fugu Max saves you $8.70/month

That's 45% cheaper than Nova Premier 1.0 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterNova Premier 1.0Fugu Max
Context Window1M1M
Max Output Tokens32,000128,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedOct 31, 2025Sep 11, 2026
Last updated: 50m ago

相关对比

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Fugu Max (2026) | LM Market Cap