Skip to content

o3 vs Fugu Max

o3

OpenAI

87#60
vs
Fugu Max

sakana

40#246
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo3DeltaFugu Max
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
88
+88
0
Pricing
92
-2
94
Context window size
84
-11
95
Recency
38
-62
100
Output Capacity
80
-2
82
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
4 wins
Fugu Max wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (32 data points)
o3Fugu Max
o3

86.7

current score

Leader

o3

right now

Fugu Max

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o3

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

Fugu Max

sakana

Best Value
Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Fugu Max saves you $100.00/month

That's $1200.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

17% cheaper
Choose Fugu Max for cost optimization

o3 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
Fugu Max pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Winner
o3

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Fugu Max

sakana

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico3Fugu MaxWinner
Overall Score
87
40
o3
Rank#60#246
o3
Quality Rank#60#246
o3
Adoption Rank#60#246
o3
Parameters------
Context Window200K1000K
Fugu Max
Pricing$2.00/$8.00/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
o3
Benchmarks
88
--
o3
Pricing
92
94
Fugu Max
Context window size
84
95
Fugu Max
Recency
38
100
Fugu Max
Output Capacity
80
82
Fugu Max
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
o3: 0Fugu Max: 0
o3
Fugu Max
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.3%-
MMLU-Pro
85.8%-
GPQA Diamond
87.7%-
MATH-500
99%-
HumanEval
97%-
SWE-bench Verified
71.7%-
AIME 2024
96.7%-
IFEval
92%-
BBH
93%-
Arena Elo
1415-
LiveBench
74.8%-
HLE
30.1%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o3Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #60), placing it in the top 80% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Fugu MaxEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #246), placing it in the top 16% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

o3 has a 47-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o3 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Fugu Max when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
o3Best Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00
Fugu Max
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.200
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

o3 offers 20% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $120.00/month with Fugu Max vs $150.00/month with o3 - a $30.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o3Faster
Speed score0/100
Fugu Max
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Fugu Max also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Fugu Max

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($6.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Fugu Max

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (87/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3

o3 clearly outperforms Fugu Max with a significant 46.7-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 is the stronger choice. However, Fugu Max may still excel in niche scenarios.

o3
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by sakana

  • Choose for Cost - 20% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo3Fugu Max
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o3

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

Fugu Max

sakana

Best Value
$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Fugu Max saves you $2.40/month

That's 18% cheaper than o3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero3Fugu Max
Context Window200K1M
Max Output Tokens100,000128,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedApr 16, 2025Sep 11, 2026
Last updated: 48m ago

相关对比

o3 vs Fugu Max (2026) | LM Market Cap