Skip to content

o3 vs Grok 4.7

o3

OpenAI

87#60
vs
Grok 4.7

xAI

89#42
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo3DeltaGrok 4.7
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
88
+2
86
Pricing
92
-3
95
Context window size
84
-6
90
Recency
38
-62
100
Output Capacity
80
-10
90
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
4 wins
Grok 4.7 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (32 data points)
o3Grok 4.7
o3

86.7

current score

Leader

Grok 4.7

right now

Grok 4.7

88.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o3

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

Grok 4.7

xAI

Best Value
Per request$0.004000
Daily$13.33
Monthly$400.00
Annual$4800.00

Grok 4.7 saves you $200.00/month

That's $2400.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

33% cheaper
Choose Grok 4.7 for cost optimization

o3 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
Grok 4.7 pricing:
Input:$1.60/M tokens
Output:$4.80/M tokens
o3

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Winner
Grok 4.7

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico3Grok 4.7Winner
Overall Score
87
89
Grok 4.7
Rank#60#42
Grok 4.7
Quality Rank#60#42
Grok 4.7
Adoption Rank#60#42
Grok 4.7
Parameters------
Context Window200K500K
Grok 4.7
Pricing$2.00/$8.00/M$1.60/$4.80/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
o3
Benchmarks
88
86
o3
Pricing
92
95
Grok 4.7
Context window size
84
90
Grok 4.7
Recency
38
100
Grok 4.7
Output Capacity
80
90
Grok 4.7
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
o3: 10Grok 4.7: 1
o3
Grok 4.7
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.3%91.5%
MMLU-Pro
85.8%83.5%
GPQA Diamond
87.7%82%
MATH-500
99%95%
HumanEval
97%95.5%
SWE-bench Verified
71.7%70%
AIME 2024
96.7%88%
IFEval
92%91%
BBH
93%90%
Arena Elo
14151462
LiveBench
74.8%73%
HLE
30.1%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o3Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #60), placing it in the top 80% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.7Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #42), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 2-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o3 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Grok 4.7 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (500K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
o3
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00
Grok 4.7Best Value
Input cost$1.60/M tokens
Output cost$4.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.072
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$96.00

Grok 4.7 offers 36% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $96.00/month with Grok 4.7 vs $150.00/month with o3 - a $54.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o3Faster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.7
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok 4.7 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (500K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Grok 4.7

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok 4.7

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.7

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.7

o3 and Grok 4.7 are extremely close in overall performance (only 2.0999999999999943 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Grok 4.7
Recommended

by xAI

  • Choose for Cost - 36% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo3Grok 4.7
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o3

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7

xAI

Best Value
$8.64
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7 saves you $4.56/month

That's 35% cheaper than o3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero3Grok 4.7
Context Window200K500K
Max Output Tokens100,000450,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedApr 16, 2025Sep 21, 2026
Last updated: 47m ago

相关对比

o3 vs Grok 4.7 (2026) | LM Market Cap