Skip to content

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Gemma 4 31B

Google

80#45
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGemma 4 31BDeltaQwen3.6 Max Preview
Capabilities
83
+17
67
Benchmarks
86
+11
75
Pricing
100
+6
94
Context window size
77
--
77
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
90
+10
80
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
0 wins
Gemma 4 31B wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (14 data points)
Gemma 4 31BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Gemma 4 31B

80

current score

Leader

Gemma 4 31B

right now

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

74.4

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Gemma 4 31B

Google

Best Value
Per request$0.000295
Daily$0.98
Monthly$29.50
Annual$354.00

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Alibaba

Per request$0.004160
Daily$13.87
Monthly$416.00
Annual$4992.00

Gemma 4 31B saves you $386.50/month

That's $4638.00/year compared to Qwen3.6 Max Preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

93% cheaper
Choose Gemma 4 31B for cost optimization

Gemma 4 31B pricing:
Input:$0.12/M tokens
Output:$0.35/M tokens
Qwen3.6 Max Preview pricing:
Input:$1.04/M tokens
Output:$6.24/M tokens
Winner
Gemma 4 31B

Google

80

Composite Score

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Alibaba

74

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGemma 4 31BQwen3.6 Max PreviewWinner
Overall Score
80
74
Gemma 4 31B
Rank#45#71
Gemma 4 31B
Quality Rank#45#71
Gemma 4 31B
Adoption Rank#45#71
Gemma 4 31B
Parameters31B----
Context Window262K262K--
Pricing$0.12/$0.35/M$1.04/$6.24/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
67
Gemma 4 31B
Benchmarks
86
75
Gemma 4 31B
Pricing
100
94
Gemma 4 31B
Context window size
77
77
Gemma 4 31B
Recency
100
100
Gemma 4 31B
Output Capacity
90
80
Gemma 4 31B
Benchmark Head-to-Head(7 benchmarks)
Gemma 4: 0Qwen3.6 Max: 1
Gemma 4
Qwen3.6 Max
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU-Pro
85.2%-
GPQA Diamond
84.3%-
AIME 2024
89.2%-
BBH
74.4%-
Arena Elo
14511460
LiveBench
80%-
HLE
19.5%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Gemma 4 31BStrong Performer

Scores 80/100 (rank #45), placing it in the top 85% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3.6 Max PreviewStrong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #71), placing it in the top 76% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Gemma 4 31B has a 6-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemma 4 31B when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Qwen3.6 Max Preview when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Gemma 4 31BBest Value
Input cost$0.12/M tokens
Output cost$0.35/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.006
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$7.05
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Input cost$1.04/M tokens
Output cost$6.24/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.098
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$109.20

Gemma 4 31B offers 94% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $7.05/month with Gemma 4 31B vs $109.20/month with Qwen3.6 Max Preview - a $102.15 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Gemma 4 31BFaster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Gemma 4 31B

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Gemma 4 31B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Gemma 4 31B

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Gemma 4 31B

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.35/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Gemma 4 31B

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (80/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Gemma 4 31B

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Gemma 4 31B
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B has a moderate advantage with a 5.599999999999994-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Qwen3.6 Max Preview has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

Gemma 4 31B
Recommended

by Google

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 94% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityGemma 4 31BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Gemma 4 31B

Google

Best Value
$0.6360
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Alibaba

$9.36
estimated monthly cost

Gemma 4 31B saves you $8.72/month

That's 93% cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGemma 4 31BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Context Window262K262K
Max Output Tokens262,14465,536
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedApr 2, 2026Apr 27, 2026
Last updated: 51m ago

相关对比

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview (2026) | LM Market Cap