Skip to content

Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok 4.5

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

81#82
vs
Grok 4.5

xAI

89#44
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalQwen3.8 MaxDeltaGrok 4.5
Capabilities
83
-17
100
Benchmarks
80
+4
76
Pricing
94
--
94
Context window size
95
+5
90
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
85
+65
20
Overall Result
3 wins
of 6
1 wins
Qwen3.8 Max wins 3 of 6 signals

Score History Unavailable

Not enough historical data to show a comparison chart. Score history is recorded weekly and will be available after at least two data points are collected.

80.6

Qwen3.8 Max

vs

88.8

Grok 4.5

Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Grok 4.5

xAI

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00
Qwen3.8 Max pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Grok 4.5 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

81

Composite Score

Winner
Grok 4.5

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricQwen3.8 MaxGrok 4.5Winner
Overall Score
81
89
Grok 4.5
Rank#82#44
Grok 4.5
Quality Rank#82#44
Grok 4.5
Adoption Rank#82#44
Grok 4.5
Parameters------
Context Window1000K500K
Qwen3.8 Max
Pricing$2.00/$6.00/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
100
Grok 4.5
Benchmarks
80
76
Qwen3.8 Max
Pricing
94
94
Qwen3.8 Max
Context window size
95
90
Qwen3.8 Max
Recency
100
100
Qwen3.8 Max
Output Capacity
85
20
Qwen3.8 Max
Benchmark Head-to-Head(1 benchmarks)
Qwen3.8 Max: 1Grok 4.5: 0
Qwen3.8 Max
Grok 4.5
Normalized 0-100%
Arena Elo
14971468
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Qwen3.8 MaxStrong Performer

Scores 81/100 (rank #82), placing it in the top 72% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.5Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #44), placing it in the top 85% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Grok 4.5 has a 8-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Qwen3.8 Max when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Grok 4.5 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Qwen3.8 Max
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.099
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00
Grok 4.5Best Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.090
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Qwen3.8 MaxFaster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.5
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Qwen3.8 Max

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Qwen3.8 Max also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Qwen3.8 Max

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3.8 Max

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($6.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Qwen3.8 Max

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.5

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Qwen3.8 Max
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 has a moderate advantage with a 8.200000000000003-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Qwen3.8 Max has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 0% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Grok 4.5
Recommended

by xAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityQwen3.8 MaxGrok 4.5
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.5

xAI

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterQwen3.8 MaxGrok 4.5
Context Window1M500K
Max Output Tokens131,072--
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedAug 3, 2026Jul 8, 2026
Last updated: 21m ago

相关对比

Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok 4.5 (2026) | LM Market Cap