Skip to content

Qwen3 Max vs GLM 5

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

67#128
vs
GLM 5

Zhipu AI

78#73
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalQwen3 MaxDeltaGLM 5
Capabilities
50
-17
67
Benchmarks
69
-12
81
Pricing
96
-1
98
Context window size
86
+2
84
Recency
77
-23
100
Output Capacity
75
-10
85
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
5 wins
GLM 5 wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
Qwen3 MaxGLM 5
Qwen3 Max

67.4

current score

Leader

GLM 5

right now

GLM 5

78

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

Per request$0.002730
Daily$9.10
Monthly$273.00
Annual$3276.00

GLM 5

Zhipu AI

Best Value
Per request$0.002225
Daily$7.42
Monthly$222.50
Annual$2670.00

GLM 5 saves you $50.50/month

That's $606.00/year compared to Qwen3 Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

18% cheaper
Choose GLM 5 for cost optimization

Qwen3 Max pricing:
Input:$0.78/M tokens
Output:$3.90/M tokens
GLM 5 pricing:
Input:$0.95/M tokens
Output:$2.55/M tokens
Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

67

Composite Score

Winner
GLM 5

Zhipu AI

78

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricQwen3 MaxGLM 5Winner
Overall Score
67
78
GLM 5
Rank#128#73
GLM 5
Quality Rank#128#73
GLM 5
Adoption Rank#128#73
GLM 5
Parameters------
Context Window262K205K
Qwen3 Max
Pricing$0.78/$3.90/M$0.95/$2.55/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
67
GLM 5
Benchmarks
69
81
GLM 5
Pricing
96
98
GLM 5
Context window size
86
84
Qwen3 Max
Recency
77
100
GLM 5
Output Capacity
75
85
GLM 5
Benchmark Head-to-Head(2 benchmarks)
Qwen3 Max: 0GLM 5: 1
Qwen3 Max
GLM 5
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU-Pro
85.7%86%
Arena Elo
-1457
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Qwen3 MaxCompetitive

Scores 67/100 (rank #128), placing it in the top 56% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
GLM 5Strong Performer

Scores 78/100 (rank #73), placing it in the top 75% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

GLM 5 has a 11-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Qwen3 Max when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements

Choose GLM 5 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Qwen3 Max
Input cost$0.78/M tokens
Output cost$3.90/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.069
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$70.20
GLM 5Best Value
Input cost$0.95/M tokens
Output cost$2.55/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.045
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$52.50

GLM 5 offers 25% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $52.50/month with GLM 5 vs $70.20/month with Qwen3 Max - a $17.70 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Qwen3 MaxFaster
Speed score0/100
GLM 5
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Qwen3 Max

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GLM 5 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Qwen3 Max

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3 Max

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.55/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

GLM 5

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (78/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GLM 5
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GLM 5

GLM 5 clearly outperforms Qwen3 Max with a significant 10.599999999999994-point lead. For most general use cases, GLM 5 is the stronger choice. However, Qwen3 Max may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
GLM 5
Recommended

by Zhipu AI

  • Choose for Cost - 25% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityQwen3 MaxGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

$6.08
estimated monthly cost

GLM 5

Zhipu AI

Best Value
$4.77
estimated monthly cost

GLM 5 saves you $1.31/month

That's 22% cheaper than Qwen3 Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterQwen3 MaxGLM 5
Context Window262K205K
Max Output Tokens32,768131,072
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedSep 23, 2025Feb 11, 2026
Last updated: just now

相关对比

Qwen3 Max vs GLM 5 (2026) | LM Market Cap