Skip to content

Fugu Max vs Grok Build 0.1

Fugu Max

sakana

40#246
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalFugu MaxDeltaGrok Build 0.1
Capabilities
100
--
100
Pricing
94
-4
98
Context window size
95
+9
86
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
82
-4
86
Overall Result
1 wins
of 5
2 wins
Grok Build 0.1 wins 2 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (7 data points)
Fugu MaxGrok Build 0.1
Fugu Max

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Grok Build 0.1

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Fugu Max

sakana

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Grok Build 0.1

xAI

Best Value
Per request$0.002000
Daily$6.67
Monthly$200.00
Annual$2400.00

Grok Build 0.1 saves you $300.00/month

That's $3600.00/year compared to Fugu Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

60% cheaper
Choose Grok Build 0.1 for cost optimization

Fugu Max pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Grok Build 0.1 pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$2.00/M tokens
Tie
Fugu Max

sakana

40

Composite Score

Tie
Grok Build 0.1

xAI

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricFugu MaxGrok Build 0.1Winner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#246#310
Fugu Max
Quality Rank#246#310
Fugu Max
Adoption Rank#246#310
Fugu Max
Parameters------
Context Window1000K256K
Fugu Max
Pricing$2.00/$6.00/M$1.00/$2.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
Fugu Max
Pricing
94
98
Grok Build 0.1
Context window size
95
86
Fugu Max
Recency
100
100
Fugu Max
Output Capacity
82
86
Grok Build 0.1
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Fugu MaxEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #246), placing it in the top 16% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok Build 0.1Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #310), placing it in the top -7% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Fugu Max when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Grok Build 0.1 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Fugu Max
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.200
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00
Grok Build 0.1Best Value
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$2.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.075
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$45.00

Grok Build 0.1 offers 63% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $45.00/month with Grok Build 0.1 vs $120.00/month with Fugu Max - a $75.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Fugu MaxFaster
Speed score0/100
Grok Build 0.1
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Fugu Max

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok Build 0.1 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Fugu Max

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Fugu Max

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok Build 0.1

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Fugu Max

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Fugu Max
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Fugu Max

Fugu Max and Grok Build 0.1 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Fugu Max
Recommended

by sakana

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by xAI

  • Choose for Cost - 63% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityFugu MaxGrok Build 0.1
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Fugu Max

sakana

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Grok Build 0.1

xAI

Best Value
$4.20
estimated monthly cost

Grok Build 0.1 saves you $6.60/month

That's 61% cheaper than Fugu Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterFugu MaxGrok Build 0.1
Context Window1M256K
Max Output Tokens128,000230,400
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedSep 11, 2026May 20, 2026
Last updated: 1h ago

相关对比

Fugu Max vs Grok Build 0.1 (2026) | LM Market Cap