| Signal | Grok 3 Mini Beta | Delta | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | +67 | |
Benchmarks | 61 | +61 | |
Pricing | 1 | 0 | |
Context window size | 81 | +5 | |
Recency | 68 | +65 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -45 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
30
days higher
0
days
0
days higher
xAI
Microsoft
Grok 3 Mini Beta saves you $38.00/month
That's $456.00/year compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Grok 3 Mini Beta | WizardLM-2 8x22B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66 | 32 | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Rank | #188 | #306 | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Quality Rank | #188 | #306 | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Adoption Rank | #188 | #306 | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Parameters | -- | 22B | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 66K | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Pricing | $0.30/$0.50/M | $0.62/$0.62/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 17 | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Benchmarks | 61 | -- | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Pricing | 1 | 1 | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
| Context window size | 81 | 76 | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Recency | 68 | 3 | Grok 3 Mini Beta |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 65 | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 66/100 (rank #188), placing it in the top 36% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 32/100 (rank #306), placing it in the top -5% of all 290 models tracked.
Grok 3 Mini Beta has a 34-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Grok 3 Mini Beta offers 35% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $12.00/month with Grok 3 Mini Beta vs $18.60/month with WizardLM-2 8x22B - a $6.60 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Grok 3 Mini Beta also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (66/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Grok 3 Mini Beta clearly outperforms WizardLM-2 8x22B with a significant 34-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 3 Mini Beta is the stronger choice. However, WizardLM-2 8x22B may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Grok 3 Mini Beta
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Grok 3 Mini Beta
35% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Grok 3 Mini Beta
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Grok 3 Mini Beta
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Grok 3 Mini Beta
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by xAI
| Capability | Grok 3 Mini Beta | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
xAI
Microsoft
Grok 3 Mini Beta saves you $0.7200/month
That's 39% cheaper than WizardLM-2 8x22B at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Grok 3 Mini Beta | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 66K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 8,000 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Apr 9, 2025 | Apr 16, 2024 |
Grok 3 Mini Beta scores 66/100 (rank #188) compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's 32/100 (rank #306), giving it a 34-point advantage. Grok 3 Mini Beta is the stronger overall choice, though WizardLM-2 8x22B may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Grok 3 Mini Beta is ranked #188 and WizardLM-2 8x22B is ranked #306 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Grok 3 Mini Beta is cheaper at $0.50/M output tokens vs WizardLM-2 8x22B's $0.62/M output tokens - 1.2x more expensive. Input token pricing: Grok 3 Mini Beta at $0.30/M vs WizardLM-2 8x22B at $0.62/M.
Grok 3 Mini Beta has a larger context window of 131,072 tokens compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's 65,535 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.