Skip to content

减配监测 - AI缩水指数

你的AI模型是否在掉队?我们每周追踪 26 个闭源API模型的竞争排名。在 34 周内,96% 的模型排名下降 - 许多价格却没有降低。

排名下降模型

25 of 26

平均排名下降

+59.4 positions

最差供应商

ByteDance

最大跌幅

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

#10 → #236

排名下降最严重的模型

34 周内排名下降最多的模型。线条向下 = 排名下降。

Rank Trajectory - 10 Biggest Falls

2026-w08 to 2026-w41 - among 273 proprietary coding models

LMMarketCap.com

排名下降排行

34 周内排名位置下降最多的模型。

Positions Lost

2026-w08 to 2026-w41 - higher = more decline

LMMarketCap.com

本周减配预警

本周排名明显下降的模型(下降2个以上位置)。

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 - Rank Trend

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Alibaba

critical

#10 → #236

Dropped 226 positions over 34 weeks

2026-w082026-w41

$1.17/M - unchanged

Share on X
LMMarketCap.com

Seed 1.6 - Rank Trend

Seed 1.6

ByteDance

critical

#27 → #242

Dropped 215 positions over 34 weeks

2026-w082026-w41

$1.47/M - unchanged

Share on X
LMMarketCap.com

Seed-2.0-Mini - Rank Trend

Seed-2.0-Mini

ByteDance

critical

#21 → #234

Dropped 213 positions over 34 weeks

2026-w082026-w41

$0.31/M - unchanged

Share on X
LMMarketCap.com

供应商成绩单

按 34 周平均排名变化评估供应商竞争力。仅包含2个以上被追踪模型的供应商。

Provider Avg Rank Change - 34 Weeks

Positive = models dropped in rank, Negative = models climbed

LMMarketCap.com
提供商等级模型Avg Rank
ByteDanceF2+214.0
AnthropicF5+52.2
GoogleF6+39.3
OpenAIF11+20.2

缩水排行榜

26 个排名有变化的模型,按排名变化排序。

Status模型2026-w082026-w41Change
criticalQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Alibaba#10#236+226
criticalSeed 1.6ByteDance#27#242+215
criticalSeed-2.0-MiniByteDance#21#234+213
criticalNova 2 LiteAmazon#26#137+111
criticalClaude Haiku 4.5Anthropic#25#117+92
criticalGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle#9#78+69
criticalClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic#2#58+56
criticalClaude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic#11#65+54
criticalGemini 2.5 FlashGoogle#32#85+53
criticalGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle#31#83+52
criticalClaude Opus 4.5Anthropic#20#60+40
criticalGPT-5.1OpenAI#12#51+39
criticalGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google#29#64+35
criticalGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAI#16#50+34
criticalGPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI#7#40+33
criticalGemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle#17#45+28
criticalGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI#30#54+24
criticalGPT-5 ProOpenAI#19#41+22
criticalClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic#6#25+19
criticalGPT-5.4OpenAI#1#17+16
criticalGPT-5.2OpenAI#8#23+15
criticalGPT-5OpenAI#28#43+15
criticalGPT-5.4 ProOpenAI#4#15+11
criticalGPT-5.2 ProOpenAI#13#21+8
warningGPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI#15#20+5
improvingGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle#14#13-1

缩水如何衡量

我们的缩水指数追踪闭源AI模型在竞争排名中的位置变化,结合价格变动来衡量用户实际获得的价值。

竞争排名

每个模型在所有闭源编码模型中按综合质量分数排名。排名下降意味着竞争对手已经超越了该模型 - 无论模型本身是否改变。

缩水分数

缩水分数(0-100):每下降1个排名位置 = 3分,价格上涨每1% = 2分。公式:clamp(排名变化 * 3 + max(0, 价格百分比变化 * 2), 0, 100)。

状态等级

严重(下降8+位)、警告(4-7位)、关注(1-3位)、稳定(0位)、改善(上升)。基于整个追踪期间的排名变化。

数据来源

追踪 34 周数据(2026-w08 至 2026-w41)。闭源编码模型池从约108个增长到约156个。完整评分方法请参阅 评分方法 页面。

Frequently Asked Questions

We track each proprietary AI model's competitive ranking among all proprietary coding models available via API, measured weekly. When a model drops from #2 to #6, it means 4 models now score higher than it did - whether because competitors improved or the model itself changed. This captures the real competitive position that determines what users should pick.

Ranking drops happen for several reasons: new competitors launch with better specs (context window, capabilities, output length), existing competitors get updates, or a model's own specs change. Between w08 and w14, the proprietary coding model pool grew from 108 to 156 models. Even a model with unchanged quality will drop in rank as better alternatives enter the market.

Open-source models have published, immutable weights. Once released, they cannot be silently changed by a provider. Any ranking shifts for open-source models come from new competitors entering, not from the model itself changing. The shrinkflation concept - paying the same price for a relatively worse product - only applies to proprietary API models.

Shrinkflation Score (0-100) combines rank decline and price changes: each position dropped scores 3 points, and price increases add 2 points per percent increase. Formula: clamp(rankDelta * 3 + max(0, pricePctChange * 2), 0, 100). A model that dropped 10 positions with unchanged pricing scores 30. Higher = worse for users.

Absolutely. This is the most common scenario. The AI market moves fast - 48 new proprietary models were added to our tracker in just 7 weeks. A model can be unchanged but its ranking drops because better alternatives now exist. This is still meaningful for users: you're paying the same price for a model that's no longer best-in-class.

相关

AI Shrinkflation Index - Is Your AI Falling Behind? | LM Market Cap