减配监测 - AI缩水指数
你的AI模型是否在掉队?我们每周追踪 28 个闭源API模型的竞争排名。在 21 周内,86% 的模型排名下降 - 许多价格却没有降低。
排名下降模型
24 of 28
平均排名下降
+30.3 positions
最差供应商
ByteDance
最大跌幅
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
#10 → #127
排名下降最严重的模型
21 周内排名下降最多的模型。线条向下 = 排名下降。
Rank Trajectory - 10 Biggest Falls
2026-w08 to 2026-w28 - among 168 proprietary coding models
排名下降排行
21 周内排名位置下降最多的模型。
Positions Lost
2026-w08 to 2026-w28 - higher = more decline
本周减配预警
本周排名明显下降的模型(下降2个以上位置)。
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 - Rank Trend
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Alibaba
#10 → #127
Dropped 117 positions over 21 weeks
$1.17/M - unchanged
Share on XSeed 1.6 - Rank Trend
Seed 1.6
ByteDance
#27 → #133
Dropped 106 positions over 21 weeks
$1.47/M - unchanged
Share on XSeed-2.0-Mini - Rank Trend
Seed-2.0-Mini
ByteDance
#21 → #125
Dropped 104 positions over 21 weeks
$0.31/M - unchanged
Share on XNova 2 Lite - Rank Trend
Nova 2 Lite
Amazon
#26 → #87
Dropped 61 positions over 21 weeks
$1.84/M - unchanged
Share on XClaude Haiku 4.5 - Rank Trend
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
#25 → #70
Dropped 45 positions over 21 weeks
$3.80/M - unchanged
Share on XGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview - Rank Trend
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
#9 → #46
Dropped 37 positions over 21 weeks
$1.12/M - unchanged
Share on X供应商成绩单
按 21 周平均排名变化评估供应商竞争力。仅包含2个以上被追踪模型的供应商。
Provider Avg Rank Change - 21 Weeks
Positive = models dropped in rank, Negative = models climbed
| 提供商 | 等级 | 模型 | Avg Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| ByteDance | F | 2 | +105.0 |
| Anthropic | F | 5 | +27.0 |
| F | 6 | +14.5 | |
| OpenAI | F | 13 | +8.1 |
缩水排行榜
27 个排名有变化的模型,按排名变化排序。
缩水如何衡量
我们的缩水指数追踪闭源AI模型在竞争排名中的位置变化,结合价格变动来衡量用户实际获得的价值。
竞争排名
每个模型在所有闭源编码模型中按综合质量分数排名。排名下降意味着竞争对手已经超越了该模型 - 无论模型本身是否改变。
缩水分数
缩水分数(0-100):每下降1个排名位置 = 3分,价格上涨每1% = 2分。公式:clamp(排名变化 * 3 + max(0, 价格百分比变化 * 2), 0, 100)。
状态等级
严重(下降8+位)、警告(4-7位)、关注(1-3位)、稳定(0位)、改善(上升)。基于整个追踪期间的排名变化。
数据来源
追踪 21 周数据(2026-w08 至 2026-w28)。闭源编码模型池从约108个增长到约156个。完整评分方法请参阅 评分方法 页面。
We track each proprietary AI model's competitive ranking among all proprietary coding models available via API, measured weekly. When a model drops from #2 to #6, it means 4 models now score higher than it did - whether because competitors improved or the model itself changed. This captures the real competitive position that determines what users should pick.
Ranking drops happen for several reasons: new competitors launch with better specs (context window, capabilities, output length), existing competitors get updates, or a model's own specs change. Between w08 and w14, the proprietary coding model pool grew from 108 to 156 models. Even a model with unchanged quality will drop in rank as better alternatives enter the market.
Open-source models have published, immutable weights. Once released, they cannot be silently changed by a provider. Any ranking shifts for open-source models come from new competitors entering, not from the model itself changing. The shrinkflation concept - paying the same price for a relatively worse product - only applies to proprietary API models.
Shrinkflation Score (0-100) combines rank decline and price changes: each position dropped scores 3 points, and price increases add 2 points per percent increase. Formula: clamp(rankDelta * 3 + max(0, pricePctChange * 2), 0, 100). A model that dropped 10 positions with unchanged pricing scores 30. Higher = worse for users.
Absolutely. This is the most common scenario. The AI market moves fast - 48 new proprietary models were added to our tracker in just 7 weeks. A model can be unchanged but its ranking drops because better alternatives now exist. This is still meaningful for users: you're paying the same price for a model that's no longer best-in-class.