| Signal | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Delta | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 33 | -33 | |
Pricing | 1 | -9 | |
Context window size | 81 | 0 | |
Recency | 83 | +40 | |
Output Capacity | 68 | -2 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 5 | 4 wins |
9
days higher
4
days
17
days higher
Baidu
OpenAI
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B saves you $667.00/month
That's $8004.00/year compared to GPT-4o (2024-11-20) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 63 | 63 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Rank | #210 | #211 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Quality Rank | #210 | #211 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Adoption Rank | #210 | #211 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Parameters | 300B | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 123K | 128K | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
| Pricing | $0.28/$1.10/M | $2.50/$10.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 33 | 67 | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
| Pricing | 1 | 10 | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
| Context window size | 81 | 81 | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
| Recency | 83 | 43 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Output Capacity | 68 | 70 | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 63/100 (rank #210), placing it in the top 28% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 63/100 (rank #211), placing it in the top 28% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B offers 89% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $20.70/month with ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs $187.50/month with GPT-4o (2024-11-20) - a $166.80 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (128K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.10/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (63/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and GPT-4o (2024-11-20) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.10000000000000142 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
89% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Baidu
| Capability | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Baidu
OpenAI
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B saves you $14.68/month
That's 89% cheaper than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 123K | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 12,000 | 16,384 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Jun 30, 2025 | Nov 20, 2024 |
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B scores 63/100 (rank #210) compared to GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s 63/100 (rank #211), giving it a 0-point advantage. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is the stronger overall choice, though GPT-4o (2024-11-20) may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is ranked #210 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20) is ranked #211 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper at $1.10/M output tokens vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s $10.00/M output tokens - 9.1x more expensive. Input token pricing: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at $0.28/M vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) at $2.50/M.
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has a larger context window of 128,000 tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B 's 123,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.