Skip to content

GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4.1 (batch)

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

68#174
vs
GPT-4.1 (batch)

OpenAI

68#175
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-4.1DeltaGPT-4.1 (batch)
Capabilities
83
--
83
Benchmarks
70
--
70
Pricing
92
-4
96
Context window size
96
--
96
Recency
45
--
45
Output Capacity
75
--
75
Overall Result
0 wins
of 6
1 wins
GPT-4.1 (batch) wins 1 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
GPT-4.1GPT-4.1 (batch)
GPT-4.1

67.7

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

GPT-4.1 (batch)

67.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

GPT-4.1 (batch)

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.003000
Daily$10.00
Monthly$300.00
Annual$3600.00

GPT-4.1 (batch) saves you $300.00/month

That's $3600.00/year compared to GPT-4.1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

50% cheaper
Choose GPT-4.1 (batch) for cost optimization

GPT-4.1 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
GPT-4.1 (batch) pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$4.00/M tokens
Tie
GPT-4.1

OpenAI

68

Composite Score

Tie
GPT-4.1 (batch)

OpenAI

68

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-4.1GPT-4.1 (batch)Winner
Overall Score
68
68
--
Rank#174#175
GPT-4.1
Quality Rank#174#175
GPT-4.1
Adoption Rank#174#175
GPT-4.1
Parameters------
Context Window1048K1048K--
Pricing$2.00/$8.00/M$1.00/$4.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
83
GPT-4.1
Benchmarks
70
70
GPT-4.1
Pricing
92
96
GPT-4.1 (batch)
Context window size
96
96
GPT-4.1
Recency
45
45
GPT-4.1
Output Capacity
75
75
GPT-4.1
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
GPT-4.1: 012 tiesGPT-4.1 (batch): 0
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1 (batch)
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
89.2%89.2%
MMLU-Pro
81.8%81.8%
GPQA Diamond
56%56%
MATH-500
78.5%78.5%
HumanEval
91.5%91.5%
SWE-bench Verified
54.6%54.6%
IFEval
88.2%88.2%
BBH
84%84%
Arena Elo
13001300
LiveBench
64.5%64.5%
HLE
5.4%5.4%
BigCodeBench
31.8%31.8%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-4.1Competitive

Scores 68/100 (rank #174), placing it in the top 40% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
GPT-4.1 (batch)Competitive

Scores 68/100 (rank #175), placing it in the top 40% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-4.1 when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements

Choose GPT-4.1 (batch) when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-4.1
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.148
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00
GPT-4.1 (batch)Best Value
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$4.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.074
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$75.00

GPT-4.1 (batch) offers 50% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $75.00/month with GPT-4.1 (batch) vs $150.00/month with GPT-4.1 - a $75.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
GPT-4.1Faster
Speed score0/100
GPT-4.1 (batch)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-4.1

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-4.1 (batch) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-4.1

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1048K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

GPT-4.1

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

GPT-4.1 (batch)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (68/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GPT-4.1

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-4.1
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GPT-4.1

GPT-4.1 and GPT-4.1 (batch) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

GPT-4.1
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Cost - 50% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-4.1GPT-4.1 (batch)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

GPT-4.1 (batch)

OpenAI

Best Value
$6.60
estimated monthly cost

GPT-4.1 (batch) saves you $6.60/month

That's 50% cheaper than GPT-4.1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-4.1GPT-4.1 (batch)
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Max Output Tokens32,76832,768
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedApr 14, 2025Apr 14, 2025
Last updated: 32m ago

相关对比

GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4.1 (batch) (2026) | LM Market Cap