| Signal | GPT-4.1 Mini | Delta | GPT-4.1 Nano |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 75 | -- | |
Pricing | 2 | +1 | |
Context window size | 96 | -- | |
Recency | 69 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 75 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
7
days higher
9
days
14
days higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano saves you $90.00/month
That's $1080.00/year compared to GPT-4.1 Mini at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 Mini | GPT-4.1 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 72 | 72 | -- |
| Rank | #150 | #151 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Quality Rank | #150 | #151 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Adoption Rank | #150 | #151 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1048K | 1048K | -- |
| Pricing | $0.40/$1.60/M | $0.10/$0.40/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 83 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Benchmarks | 75 | 75 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Pricing | 2 | 0 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Context window size | 96 | 96 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Recency | 69 | 69 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Output Capacity | 75 | 75 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 72/100 (rank #150), placing it in the top 49% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 72/100 (rank #151), placing it in the top 48% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
GPT-4.1 Nano offers 75% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $7.50/month with GPT-4.1 Nano vs $30.00/month with GPT-4.1 Mini - a $22.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. GPT-4.1 Nano also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1048K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.40/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (72/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-4.1 Mini and GPT-4.1 Nano are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-4.1 Mini
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-4.1 Nano
75% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4.1 Mini
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4.1 Mini
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4.1 Mini
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-4.1 Mini | GPT-4.1 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano saves you $1.98/month
That's 75% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Mini at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4.1 Mini | GPT-4.1 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 32,768 | 32,768 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Apr 14, 2025 | Apr 14, 2025 |
Both GPT-4.1 Mini and GPT-4.1 Nano score 72/100, making them extremely close competitors. Choose based on pricing, provider ecosystem, or specific capability requirements.
GPT-4.1 Mini is ranked #150 and GPT-4.1 Nano is ranked #151 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper at $0.40/M output tokens vs GPT-4.1 Mini's $1.60/M output tokens - 4.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: GPT-4.1 Mini at $0.40/M vs GPT-4.1 Nano at $0.10/M.
GPT-4.1 Mini has a larger context window of 1,047,576 tokens compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 1,047,576 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.