GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick
| Signal | GPT-4o | Delta | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 74 | +4 | |
Pricing | 90 | -9 | |
Context window size | 81 | -14 | |
Recency | 0 | -44 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
Score History
71.2
current score
GPT-4o
right now
67.9
current score
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick saves you $690.00/month
That's $8280.00/year compared to GPT-4o at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 71 | 68 | GPT-4o |
| Rank | #157 | #173 | GPT-4o |
| Quality Rank | #157 | #173 | GPT-4o |
| Adoption Rank | #157 | #173 | GPT-4o |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 1049K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Pricing | $2.50/$10.00/M | $0.20/$0.80/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 67 | GPT-4o |
| Benchmarks | 74 | 70 | GPT-4o |
| Pricing | 90 | 99 | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context window size | 81 | 96 | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Recency | 0 | 44 | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 70 | GPT-4o |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 71/100 (rank #157), placing it in the top 46% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 68/100 (rank #173), placing it in the top 41% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 3-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose GPT-4o when you need:
- General-purpose tasks across coding, writing, and analysis
Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Llama 4 Maverick offers 92% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $15.00/month with Llama 4 Maverick vs $187.50/month with GPT-4o - a $172.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Llama 4 Maverick also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (71/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-4o has a moderate advantage with a 3.299999999999997-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Llama 4 Maverick has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-4o
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Llama 4 Maverick
92% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4o
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4o
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4o
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick saves you $15.18/month
That's 92% cheaper than GPT-4o at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 16,384 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | May 13, 2024 | Apr 5, 2025 |