| Signal | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | Delta | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 88 | +1 | |
Pricing | 98 | +12 | |
Context window size | 89 | +8 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 83 | +13 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
Score History
87
current score
GPT-5.3 Chat
right now
87.4
current score
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini saves you $750.00/month
That's $9000.00/year compared to GPT-5.3 Chat at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | GPT-5.3 Chat | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 87 | 87 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
| Rank | #19 | #17 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
| Quality Rank | #19 | #17 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
| Adoption Rank | #19 | #17 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 128K | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Pricing | $0.25/$2.00/M | $1.75/$14.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 83 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Benchmarks | 88 | 88 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Pricing | 98 | 86 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Context window size | 89 | 81 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Output Capacity | 83 | 70 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 87/100 (rank #19), placing it in the top 94% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 87/100 (rank #17), placing it in the top 94% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini offers 86% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $33.75/month with GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs $236.25/month with GPT-5.3 Chat - a $202.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (400K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (87/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and GPT-5.3 Chat are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.4000000000000057 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
86% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini saves you $17.10/month
That's 86% cheaper than GPT-5.3 Chat at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 400K | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 100,000 | 16,384 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Nov 13, 2025 | Mar 3, 2026 |
GPT-5.3 Chat scores 87/100 (rank #17) compared to GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's 87/100 (rank #19), giving it a 0-point advantage. GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger overall choice, though GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini may excel in specific areas like cost efficiency.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is ranked #19 and GPT-5.3 Chat is ranked #17 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is cheaper at $2.00/M output tokens vs GPT-5.3 Chat's $14.00/M output tokens - 7.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini at $0.25/M vs GPT-5.3 Chat at $1.75/M.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has a larger context window of 400,000 tokens compared to GPT-5.3 Chat's 128,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.