| Signal | Llemma 7b | Delta | Grok 3 Beta |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 17 | -50 | |
Pricing | 99 | +14 | |
Context window size | 57 | -24 | |
Recency | 68 | +1 | |
Output Capacity | 60 | +40 | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 5 | 2 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
eleutherai
xAI
Llemma 7b saves you $910.00/month
That's $10920.00/year compared to Grok 3 Beta at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Llemma 7b | Grok 3 Beta | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #246 | #247 | Llemma 7b |
| Quality Rank | #246 | #247 | Llemma 7b |
| Adoption Rank | #246 | #247 | Llemma 7b |
| Parameters | 7B | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 4K | 131K | Grok 3 Beta |
| Pricing | $0.80/$1.20/M | $3.00/$15.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 17 | 67 | Grok 3 Beta |
| Pricing | 99 | 85 | Llemma 7b |
| Context window size | 57 | 81 | Grok 3 Beta |
| Recency | 68 | 67 | Llemma 7b |
| Output Capacity | 60 | 20 | Llemma 7b |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #246), placing it in the top 16% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #247), placing it in the top 15% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Llemma 7b offers 89% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $30.00/month with Llemma 7b vs $270.00/month with Grok 3 Beta - a $240.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Llemma 7b also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Llemma 7b and Grok 3 Beta are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Llemma 7b
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Llemma 7b
89% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Llemma 7b
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Llemma 7b
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Llemma 7b
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by eleutherai
| Capability | Llemma 7b | Grok 3 Beta |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
eleutherai
xAI
Llemma 7b saves you $20.52/month
That's 88% cheaper than Grok 3 Beta at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Llemma 7b | Grok 3 Beta |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 4K | 131K |
| Max Output Tokens | 4,096 | -- |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Apr 14, 2025 | Apr 9, 2025 |
Both Llemma 7b and Grok 3 Beta score 40/100, making them extremely close competitors. Choose based on pricing, provider ecosystem, or specific capability requirements.
Llemma 7b is ranked #246 and Grok 3 Beta is ranked #247 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
Llemma 7b is cheaper at $1.20/M output tokens vs Grok 3 Beta's $15.00/M output tokens - 12.5x more expensive. Input token pricing: Llemma 7b at $0.80/M vs Grok 3 Beta at $3.00/M.
Grok 3 Beta has a larger context window of 131,072 tokens compared to Llemma 7b's 4,096 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.