Skip to content

Aion-3.0 vs Hy3

Aion-3.0

aion-labs

40#286
vs
Hy3

Tencent

40#287
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalAion-3.0DeltaHy3
Capabilities
67
--
67
Pricing
94
-6
100
Context window size
81
-5
86
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
72
-9
82
Overall Result
0 wins
of 5
3 wins
Hy3 wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (15 data points)
Aion-3.0Hy3
Aion-3.0

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Hy3

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Aion-3.0

aion-labs

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
Per request$0.000247
Daily$0.83
Monthly$24.75
Annual$297.00

Hy3 saves you $575.25/month

That's $6903.00/year compared to Aion-3.0 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

96% cheaper
Choose Hy3 for cost optimization

Aion-3.0 pricing:
Input:$3.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Hy3 pricing:
Input:$0.08/M tokens
Output:$0.33/M tokens
Tie
Aion-3.0

aion-labs

40

Composite Score

Tie
Hy3

Tencent

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricAion-3.0Hy3Winner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#286#287
Aion-3.0
Quality Rank#286#287
Aion-3.0
Adoption Rank#286#287
Aion-3.0
Parameters------
Context Window131K262K
Hy3
Pricing$3.00/$6.00/M$0.08/$0.33/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
67
Aion-3.0
Pricing
94
100
Hy3
Context window size
81
86
Hy3
Recency
100
100
Aion-3.0
Output Capacity
72
82
Hy3
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Aion-3.0Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #286), placing it in the top 2% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Hy3Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #287), placing it in the top 1% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Aion-3.0 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Hy3 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (262K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Aion-3.0
Input cost$3.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.225
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$135.00
Hy3Best Value
Input cost$0.08/M tokens
Output cost$0.33/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.010
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$6.19

Hy3 offers 95% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $6.19/month with Hy3 vs $135.00/month with Aion-3.0 - a $128.81 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Aion-3.0Faster
Speed score0/100
Hy3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Aion-3.0

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Hy3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Aion-3.0

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Hy3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.33/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Hy3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Aion-3.0
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Aion-3.0

Aion-3.0 and Hy3 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Aion-3.0
Recommended

by aion-labs

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Tencent

  • Choose for Cost - 95% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityAion-3.0Hy3
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Aion-3.0

aion-labs

$12.60
estimated monthly cost

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
$0.5445
estimated monthly cost

Hy3 saves you $12.06/month

That's 96% cheaper than Aion-3.0 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterAion-3.0Hy3
Context Window131K262K
Max Output Tokens32,768128,000
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedJul 7, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Last updated: 12m ago

相关对比

Aion-3.0 vs Hy3 (2026) | LM Market Cap