Skip to content

Hy3 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Hy3

Tencent

75#90
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalHy3DeltaQwen3.6 Max Preview
Capabilities
67
--
67
Benchmarks
74
0
75
Pricing
100
+6
94
Context window size
86
--
86
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
85
+5
80
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
1 wins
Hy3 wins 2 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (14 data points)
Hy3Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Hy3

74.5

current score

Leader

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

right now

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

74.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
Per request$0.000396
Daily$1.32
Monthly$39.60
Annual$475.20

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Alibaba

Per request$0.004160
Daily$13.87
Monthly$416.00
Annual$4992.00

Hy3 saves you $376.40/month

That's $4516.80/year compared to Qwen3.6 Max Preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

90% cheaper
Choose Hy3 for cost optimization

Hy3 pricing:
Input:$0.13/M tokens
Output:$0.53/M tokens
Qwen3.6 Max Preview pricing:
Input:$1.04/M tokens
Output:$6.24/M tokens
Hy3

Tencent

75

Composite Score

Winner
Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Alibaba

75

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricHy3Qwen3.6 Max PreviewWinner
Overall Score
75
75
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Rank#90#89
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Quality Rank#90#89
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Adoption Rank#90#89
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Parameters------
Context Window262K262K--
Pricing$0.13/$0.53/M$1.04/$6.24/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
67
Hy3
Benchmarks
74
75
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Pricing
100
94
Hy3
Context window size
86
86
Hy3
Recency
100
100
Hy3
Output Capacity
85
80
Hy3
Benchmark Head-to-Head(1 benchmarks)
Hy3: 0Qwen3.6 Max: 1
Hy3
Qwen3.6 Max
Normalized 0-100%
Arena Elo
14571460
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Hy3Strong Performer

Scores 75/100 (rank #90), placing it in the top 69% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3.6 Max PreviewStrong Performer

Scores 75/100 (rank #89), placing it in the top 70% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Hy3 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Qwen3.6 Max Preview when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Hy3Best Value
Input cost$0.13/M tokens
Output cost$0.53/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.009
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$9.90
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Input cost$1.04/M tokens
Output cost$6.24/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.097
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$109.20

Hy3 offers 91% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $9.90/month with Hy3 vs $109.20/month with Qwen3.6 Max Preview - a $99.30 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Hy3Faster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Hy3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Hy3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Hy3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Hy3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.53/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Hy3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (75/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Hy3 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.29999999999999716 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by Tencent

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 91% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityHy3Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
$0.8712
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Alibaba

$9.36
estimated monthly cost

Hy3 saves you $8.49/month

That's 91% cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterHy3Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Context Window262K262K
Max Output Tokens128,00065,536
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedJul 6, 2026Apr 27, 2026
Last updated: 7m ago

相关对比

Hy3 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview (2026) | LM Market Cap