Hy4 preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
| Signal | Hy4 preview | Delta | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | +17 | |
Pricing | 98 | -2 | |
Context window size | 96 | +10 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 77 | +5 | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 5 | 1 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
Hy4 preview
Tencent
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionai
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante saves you $177.25/month
That's $2126.94/year compared to Hy4 preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Hy4 preview | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #284 | #282 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| Quality Rank | #284 | #282 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| Adoption Rank | #284 | #282 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1049K | 262K | Hy4 preview |
| Pricing | $0.75/$2.25/M | $0.04/$0.12/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 50 | Hy4 preview |
| Pricing | 98 | 100 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| Context window size | 96 | 86 | Hy4 preview |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Hy4 preview |
| Output Capacity | 77 | 72 | Hy4 preview |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #284), placing it in the top 2% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #282), placing it in the top 3% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Hy4 preview when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Sante when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante offers 94% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $2.48/month with Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs $45.02/month with Hy4 preview - a $42.54 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.12/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Hy4 preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Hy4 preview
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
94% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Hy4 preview
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Hy4 preview
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Hy4 preview
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Tencent
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Hy4 preview | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Hy4 preview
Tencent
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionai
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante saves you $3.83/month
That's 94% cheaper than Hy4 preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Hy4 preview | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | 64,000 | 32,768 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Aug 28, 2026 | Sep 4, 2026 |