Skip to content

Hy4 vs Ripple 65B Preview

Hy4

Tencent

40#178
vs
Ripple 65B Preview

ricursiveai

40#177
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalHy4DeltaRipple 65B Preview
Capabilities
83
+33
50
Pricing
99
-1
99
Context window size
96
--
96
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
77
-5
82
Overall Result
1 wins
of 5
2 wins
Ripple 65B Preview wins 2 of 5 signals

Score History Unavailable

Not enough historical data to show a comparison chart. Score history is recorded weekly and will be available after at least two data points are collected.

40

Hy4

vs

40

Ripple 65B Preview

Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Hy4

Tencent

Per request$0.001042
Daily$3.47
Monthly$104.22
Annual$1250.70

Ripple 65B Preview

ricursiveai

Best Value
Per request$0.000500
Daily$1.67
Monthly$50.00
Annual$600.00

Ripple 65B Preview saves you $54.22/month

That's $650.70/year compared to Hy4 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

52% cheaper
Choose Ripple 65B Preview for cost optimization

Hy4 pricing:
Input:$0.42/M tokens
Output:$1.25/M tokens
Ripple 65B Preview pricing:
Input:$0.20/M tokens
Output:$0.60/M tokens
Tie
Hy4

Tencent

40

Composite Score

Tie
Ripple 65B Preview

ricursiveai

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricHy4Ripple 65B PreviewWinner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#178#177
Ripple 65B Preview
Quality Rank#178#177
Ripple 65B Preview
Adoption Rank#178#177
Ripple 65B Preview
Parameters--65B--
Context Window1049K1049K--
Pricing$0.42/$1.25/M$0.20/$0.60/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
50
Hy4
Pricing
99
99
Ripple 65B Preview
Context window size
96
96
Hy4
Recency
100
100
Hy4
Output Capacity
77
82
Ripple 65B Preview
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Hy4Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #178), placing it in the top 39% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Ripple 65B PreviewEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #177), placing it in the top 39% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Hy4 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Ripple 65B Preview when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
Cost-Performance Analysis
Hy4
Input cost$0.42/M tokens
Output cost$1.25/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.042
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$25.01
Ripple 65B PreviewBest Value
Input cost$0.20/M tokens
Output cost$0.60/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.020
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$12.00

Ripple 65B Preview offers 52% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $12.00/month with Ripple 65B Preview vs $25.01/month with Hy4 - a $13.01 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Hy4Faster
Speed score0/100
Ripple 65B Preview
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Hy4

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Ripple 65B Preview also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Hy4

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Hy4

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.60/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Ripple 65B Preview

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Hy4

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Hy4
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Hy4

Hy4 and Ripple 65B Preview are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Hy4
Recommended

by Tencent

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by ricursiveai

  • Choose for Cost - 52% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityHy4Ripple 65B Preview
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Hy4

Tencent

$2.25
estimated monthly cost

Ripple 65B Preview

ricursiveai

Best Value
$1.08
estimated monthly cost

Ripple 65B Preview saves you $1.17/month

That's 52% cheaper than Hy4 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterHy4Ripple 65B Preview
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Max Output Tokens65,536131,072
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedNov 4, 2026Nov 4, 2026
Last updated: 8m ago

相关对比

Hy4 vs Ripple 65B Preview (2026) | LM Market Cap