| Signal | Llama 4 Scout | Delta | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 52 | +52 | |
Pricing | 100 | 0 | |
Context window size | 88 | +2 | |
Recency | 60 | -40 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -19 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
Score History
54.2
current score
Llama 4 Scout
right now
40
current score
Meta
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves you $8.00/month
That's $96.00/year compared to Llama 4 Scout at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 54 | 40 | Llama 4 Scout |
| Rank | #162 | #231 | Llama 4 Scout |
| Quality Rank | #162 | #231 | Llama 4 Scout |
| Adoption Rank | #162 | #231 | Llama 4 Scout |
| Parameters | -- | 30B | -- |
| Context Window | 328K | 262K | Llama 4 Scout |
| Pricing | $0.08/$0.30/M | $0.05/$0.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 67 | Llama 4 Scout |
| Benchmarks | 52 | -- | Llama 4 Scout |
| Pricing | 100 | 100 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Context window size | 88 | 86 | Llama 4 Scout |
| Recency | 60 | 100 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 89 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 54/100 (rank #162), placing it in the top 44% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #231), placing it in the top 21% of all 290 models tracked.
Llama 4 Scout has a 14-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers 34% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $3.75/month with Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs $5.70/month with Llama 4 Scout - a $1.95 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (328K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (54/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Llama 4 Scout clearly outperforms Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with a significant 14.200000000000003-point lead. For most general use cases, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice. However, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Llama 4 Scout
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
34% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Llama 4 Scout
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Llama 4 Scout
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Llama 4 Scout
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Meta
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Meta
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves you $0.1740/month
That's 35% cheaper than Llama 4 Scout at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Llama 4 Scout | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 328K | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 228,000 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Apr 5, 2025 | Dec 14, 2025 |