| Signal | LongCat Flash Chat | Delta | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 67 | -2 | |
Pricing | 99 | +5 | |
Context window size | 81 | +0 | |
Recency | 95 | +95 | |
Output Capacity | 85 | +65 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 1 wins |
Score History
66.7
current score
Tied
right now
66.7
current score
Meituan
Mistral AI
LongCat Flash Chat saves you $440.00/month
That's $5280.00/year compared to Mistral Large at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | LongCat Flash Chat | Mistral Large | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67 | 67 | -- |
| Rank | #75 | #77 | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Quality Rank | #75 | #77 | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Adoption Rank | #75 | #77 | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 128K | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Pricing | $0.20/$0.80/M | $2.00/$6.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 50 | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Benchmarks | 67 | 69 | Mistral Large |
| Pricing | 99 | 94 | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Context window size | 81 | 81 | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Recency | 95 | 0 | LongCat Flash Chat |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 20 | LongCat Flash Chat |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 67/100 (rank #75), placing it in the top 74% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 67/100 (rank #77), placing it in the top 74% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
LongCat Flash Chat offers 88% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $15.00/month with LongCat Flash Chat vs $120.00/month with Mistral Large - a $105.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. LongCat Flash Chat also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (67/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
LongCat Flash Chat and Mistral Large are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
LongCat Flash Chat
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
LongCat Flash Chat
88% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
LongCat Flash Chat
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
LongCat Flash Chat
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
LongCat Flash Chat
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Meituan
| Capability | LongCat Flash Chat | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Meituan
Mistral AI
LongCat Flash Chat saves you $9.48/month
That's 88% cheaper than Mistral Large at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | LongCat Flash Chat | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 131,072 | -- |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Sep 9, 2025 | Feb 26, 2024 |
Both LongCat Flash Chat and Mistral Large score 67/100, making them extremely close competitors. Choose based on pricing, provider ecosystem, or specific capability requirements.
LongCat Flash Chat is ranked #75 and Mistral Large is ranked #77 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
LongCat Flash Chat is cheaper at $0.80/M output tokens vs Mistral Large's $6.00/M output tokens - 7.5x more expensive. Input token pricing: LongCat Flash Chat at $0.20/M vs Mistral Large at $2.00/M.
LongCat Flash Chat has a larger context window of 131,072 tokens compared to Mistral Large's 128,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.