Skip to content

Mistral Large vs Mistral Large 2407

Mistral Large

Mistral AI

66#126
vs
Mistral Large 2407

Mistral AI

66#125
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalMistral LargeDeltaMistral Large 2407
Capabilities
50
--
50
Benchmarks
69
+14
55
Pricing
94
--
94
Context window size
73
0
73
Recency
0
-23
23
Output Capacity
20
--
20
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
2 wins
Mistral Large 2407 wins 2 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (22 data points)
Mistral LargeMistral Large 2407
Mistral Large

66.3

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Mistral Large 2407

66.3

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Mistral Large

Mistral AI

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Mistral Large 2407

Mistral AI

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00
Mistral Large pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Mistral Large 2407 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Tie
Mistral Large

Mistral AI

66

Composite Score

Tie
Mistral Large 2407

Mistral AI

66

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricMistral LargeMistral Large 2407Winner
Overall Score
66
66
--
Rank#126#125
Mistral Large 2407
Quality Rank#126#125
Mistral Large 2407
Adoption Rank#126#125
Mistral Large 2407
Parameters------
Context Window128K131K
Mistral Large 2407
Pricing$2.00/$6.00/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
50
Mistral Large
Benchmarks
69
55
Mistral Large
Pricing
94
94
Mistral Large
Context window size
73
73
Mistral Large 2407
Recency
0
23
Mistral Large 2407
Output Capacity
20
20
Mistral Large
Benchmark Head-to-Head(9 benchmarks)
Mistral Large: 0Mistral Large: 1
Mistral Large
Mistral Large
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
84.7%-
MMLU-Pro
69.4%-
GPQA Diamond
52.5%-
MATH-500
76%-
HumanEval
92%-
IFEval
86.5%-
BBH
80%-
Arena Elo
12801314
BigCodeBench
30%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Mistral LargeCompetitive

Scores 66/100 (rank #126), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Mistral Large 2407Competitive

Scores 66/100 (rank #125), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Mistral Large when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements

Choose Mistral Large 2407 when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements
Cost-Performance Analysis
Mistral LargeBest Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.121
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00
Mistral Large 2407
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.121
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Mistral LargeFaster
Speed score0/100
Mistral Large 2407
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Mistral Large

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Mistral Large also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Mistral Large

Long document analysis

Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Mistral Large 2407

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($6.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Mistral Large

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (66/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Mistral Large
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Mistral Large

Mistral Large and Mistral Large 2407 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Mistral Large
Recommended

by Mistral AI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 0% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Mistral AI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityMistral LargeMistral Large 2407
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Mistral Large

Mistral AI

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Mistral Large 2407

Mistral AI

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterMistral LargeMistral Large 2407
Context Window128K131K
Max Output Tokens----
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedFeb 26, 2024Nov 19, 2024
Last updated: 35m ago

相关对比

Mistral Large vs Mistral Large 2407 (2026) | LM Market Cap