Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
| Signal | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Delta | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 86 | -14 | |
Pricing | 97 | +9 | |
Context window size | 91 | -- | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 88 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 5 | 1 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) saves you $600.00/month
That's $7200.00/year compared to Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #5 | #6 | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
| Quality Rank | #5 | #6 | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
| Adoption Rank | #5 | #6 | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 131K | -- |
| Pricing | $0.50/$3.00/M | $2.00/$12.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 86 | 100 | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
| Pricing | 97 | 88 | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
| Context window size | 91 | 91 | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
| Output Capacity | 88 | 88 | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #5), placing it in the top 99% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #6), placing it in the top 98% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) when you need:
- Agentic applications using tool/function calling
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) offers 75% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $52.50/month with Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs $210.00/month with Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) - a $157.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($3.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
75% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 75% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) saves you $13.50/month
That's 75% cheaper than Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 131K |
| Max Output Tokens | 32,768 | 32,768 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Jun 18, 2026 | Jun 18, 2026 |