| Signal | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | Delta | Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -- | |
Pricing | 100 | -- | |
Context window size | 73 | -13 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 65 | -15 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 5 | 2 wins |
Score History Unavailable
Not enough historical data to show a comparison chart. Score history is recorded weekly and will be available after at least two data points are collected.
40
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
40
Nemotron 3 Ultra (free)
NVIDIA
NVIDIA
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #172 | #173 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) |
| Quality Rank | #172 | #173 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) |
| Adoption Rank | #172 | #173 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) |
| Parameters | -- | 550B | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 1000K | Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) |
| Pricing | Free | Free | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 50 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) |
| Pricing | 100 | 100 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) |
| Context window size | 73 | 86 | Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) |
| Output Capacity | 65 | 80 | Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #172), placing it in the top 41% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #173), placing it in the top 41% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
0% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by NVIDIA
| Capability | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
NVIDIA
NVIDIA
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) | Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 8,192 | 65,536 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Jun 4, 2026 | Jun 4, 2026 |