Skip to content

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs o1-pro

vs
o1-pro

OpenAI

73#81
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewDeltao1-pro
Capabilities
100
+17
83
Benchmarks
71
-6
77
Pricing
99
+94
5
Context window size
86
+10
76
Recency
100
+55
45
Output Capacity
80
-3
83
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
2 wins
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (22 data points)
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Previewo1-pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

73.1

current score

Leader

o1-pro

right now

o1-pro

73.2

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Google

Best Value
Per request$0.001000
Daily$3.33
Monthly$100.00
Annual$1200.00

o1-pro

OpenAI

Per request$0.450000
Daily$1500.00
Monthly$45000.00
Annual$540000.00

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview saves you $44900.00/month

That's $538800.00/year compared to o1-pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for cost optimization

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview pricing:
Input:$0.25/M tokens
Output:$1.50/M tokens
o1-pro pricing:
Input:$150.00/M tokens
Output:$600.00/M tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Google

73

Composite Score

Winner
o1-pro

OpenAI

73

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Previewo1-proWinner
Overall Score
73
73
o1-pro
Rank#82#81
o1-pro
Quality Rank#82#81
o1-pro
Adoption Rank#82#81
o1-pro
Parameters------
Context Window1049K200K
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Pricing$0.25/$1.50/M$150.00/$600.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
83
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Benchmarks
71
77
o1-pro
Pricing
99
5
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Context window size
86
76
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Recency
100
45
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Output Capacity
80
83
o1-pro
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
Gemini 3.1: 1o1-pro: 0
Gemini 3.1
o1-pro
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-91.8%
MMLU-Pro
-80.3%
GPQA Diamond
-78%
MATH-500
-96.4%
HumanEval
-92.4%
SWE-bench Verified
-48.9%
AIME 2024
-83.3%
IFEval
-86.5%
BBH
-89%
Arena Elo
14321350
HLE
-8.12%
BigCodeBench
-32.4%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewStrong Performer

Scores 73/100 (rank #82), placing it in the top 72% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
o1-proStrong Performer

Scores 73/100 (rank #81), placing it in the top 72% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose o1-pro when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBest Value
Input cost$0.25/M tokens
Output cost$1.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.024
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$26.25
o1-pro
Input cost$150.00/M tokens
Output cost$600.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$10.246
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$11250.00

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview offers 100% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $26.25/month with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs $11250.00/month with o1-pro - a $11223.75 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewFaster
Speed score0/100
o1-pro
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($1.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (73/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o1-pro

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o1-pro

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and o1-pro are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.10000000000000853 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by Google

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
o1-pro
Recommended

by OpenAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Previewo1-pro
Vision (Image Input)
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Google

Best Value
$2.25
estimated monthly cost

o1-pro

OpenAI

$990.00
estimated monthly cost

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview saves you $987.75/month

That's 100% cheaper than o1-pro at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Previewo1-pro
Context Window1.0M200K
Max Output Tokens65,536100,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedMar 3, 2026Mar 19, 2025
Last updated: 27m ago

相关对比

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs o1-pro (2026) | LM Market Cap