Skip to content

Hy3 vs o3 Mini (batch)

Hy3

Tencent

74#127
vs
o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

74#126
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalHy3Deltao3 Mini (batch)
Capabilities
67
-17
83
Benchmarks
74
-14
88
Pricing
100
+2
98
Context window size
86
+2
84
Recency
100
+73
27
Output Capacity
82
+2
80
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
2 wins
Hy3 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (9 data points)
Hy3o3 Mini (batch)
Hy3

74.2

current score

Leader

o3 Mini (batch)

right now

o3 Mini (batch)

74.3

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
Per request$0.000247
Daily$0.83
Monthly$24.75
Annual$297.00

o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

Per request$0.001650
Daily$5.50
Monthly$165.00
Annual$1980.00

Hy3 saves you $140.25/month

That's $1683.00/year compared to o3 Mini (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

85% cheaper
Choose Hy3 for cost optimization

Hy3 pricing:
Input:$0.08/M tokens
Output:$0.33/M tokens
o3 Mini (batch) pricing:
Input:$0.55/M tokens
Output:$2.20/M tokens
Hy3

Tencent

74

Composite Score

Winner
o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

74

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricHy3o3 Mini (batch)Winner
Overall Score
74
74
o3 Mini (batch)
Rank#127#126
o3 Mini (batch)
Quality Rank#127#126
o3 Mini (batch)
Adoption Rank#127#126
o3 Mini (batch)
Parameters------
Context Window262K200K
Hy3
Pricing$0.08/$0.33/M$0.55/$2.20/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
83
o3 Mini (batch)
Benchmarks
74
88
o3 Mini (batch)
Pricing
100
98
Hy3
Context window size
86
84
Hy3
Recency
100
27
Hy3
Output Capacity
82
80
Hy3
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
Hy3: 1o3 Mini: 0
Hy3
o3 Mini
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-92.3%
MMLU-Pro
-85.8%
GPQA Diamond
-87.7%
MATH-500
-99%
HumanEval
-97%
SWE-bench Verified
-71.7%
AIME 2024
-96.7%
IFEval
-92%
BBH
-93%
Arena Elo
14551415
LiveBench
-74.8%
HLE
-30.1%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Hy3Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #127), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
o3 Mini (batch)Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #126), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Hy3 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose o3 Mini (batch) when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Hy3Best Value
Input cost$0.08/M tokens
Output cost$0.33/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.006
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$6.19
o3 Mini (batch)
Input cost$0.55/M tokens
Output cost$2.20/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.037
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$41.25

Hy3 offers 85% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $6.19/month with Hy3 vs $41.25/month with o3 Mini (batch) - a $35.06 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Hy3Faster
Speed score0/100
o3 Mini (batch)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Hy3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Hy3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Hy3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Hy3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.33/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Hy3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (74/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3 Mini (batch)
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3 Mini (batch)

Hy3 and o3 Mini (batch) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.09999999999999432 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by Tencent

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 85% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
o3 Mini (batch)
Recommended

by OpenAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityHy3o3 Mini (batch)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
$0.5445
estimated monthly cost

o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

$3.63
estimated monthly cost

Hy3 saves you $3.09/month

That's 85% cheaper than o3 Mini (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterHy3o3 Mini (batch)
Context Window262K200K
Max Output Tokens128,000100,000
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedJul 6, 2026Jan 31, 2025
Last updated: 51m ago

相关对比

Hy3 vs o3 Mini (batch) (2026) | LM Market Cap