Skip to content

o1 vs o3 Mini

o1

OpenAI

74#106
vs
o3 Mini

OpenAI

75#105
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo1Deltao3 Mini
Capabilities
100
+17
83
Benchmarks
77
+1
76
Pricing
40
-56
96
Context window size
84
--
84
Recency
11
-8
19
Output Capacity
80
--
80
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
2 wins
It's a tie - both models win 2 signals each

Score History

Score History (35 data points)
o1o3 Mini
o1

74.4

current score

Leader

o3 Mini

right now

o3 Mini

75.3

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o1

OpenAI

Per request$0.045000
Daily$150.00
Monthly$4500.00
Annual$54000.00

o3 Mini

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.003300
Daily$11.00
Monthly$330.00
Annual$3960.00

o3 Mini saves you $4170.00/month

That's $50040.00/year compared to o1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

93% cheaper
Choose o3 Mini for cost optimization

o1 pricing:
Input:$15.00/M tokens
Output:$60.00/M tokens
o3 Mini pricing:
Input:$1.10/M tokens
Output:$4.40/M tokens
o1

OpenAI

74

Composite Score

Winner
o3 Mini

OpenAI

75

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico1o3 MiniWinner
Overall Score
74
75
o3 Mini
Rank#106#105
o3 Mini
Quality Rank#106#105
o3 Mini
Adoption Rank#106#105
o3 Mini
Parameters------
Context Window200K200K--
Pricing$15.00/$60.00/M$1.10/$4.40/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
83
o1
Benchmarks
77
76
o1
Pricing
40
96
o3 Mini
Context window size
84
84
o1
Recency
11
19
o3 Mini
Output Capacity
80
80
o1
Benchmark Head-to-Head(13 benchmarks)
o1: 2o3 Mini: 9
o1
o3 Mini
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
91.8%86.9%
MMLU-Pro
80.3%82.5%
GPQA Diamond
78%79.7%
MATH-500
96.4%97.9%
HumanEval
92.4%-
SWE-bench Verified
48.9%49.3%
AIME 2024
83.3%87.3%
IFEval
86.5%90.2%
BBH
89%88.5%
Arena Elo
13501371
LiveBench
-71.5%
HLE
8.12%20.3%
BigCodeBench
32.4%33.1%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o1Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #106), placing it in the top 64% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
o3 MiniStrong Performer

Scores 75/100 (rank #105), placing it in the top 64% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 1-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o1 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose o3 Mini when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
o1
Input cost$15.00/M tokens
Output cost$60.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$1.008
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$1125.00
o3 MiniBest Value
Input cost$1.10/M tokens
Output cost$4.40/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.073
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$82.50

o3 Mini offers 93% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $82.50/month with o3 Mini vs $1125.00/month with o1 - a $1042.50 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o1Faster
Speed score0/100
o3 Mini
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o1

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. o3 Mini also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o1

Long document analysis

Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

o1

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.40/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

o3 Mini

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (75/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3 Mini

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o1
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3 Mini

o1 and o3 Mini are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.8999999999999915 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
o3 Mini
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Cost - 93% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo1o3 Mini
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o1

OpenAI

$99.00
estimated monthly cost

o3 Mini

OpenAI

Best Value
$7.26
estimated monthly cost

o3 Mini saves you $91.74/month

That's 93% cheaper than o1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero1o3 Mini
Context Window200K200K
Max Output Tokens100,000100,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedDec 17, 2024Jan 31, 2025
Last updated: 42m ago

相关对比

o1 vs o3 Mini (2026) | LM Market Cap