Skip to content

o3 vs R1 0528

o3

OpenAI

87#60
vs
R1 0528

DeepSeek

79#88
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo3DeltaR1 0528
Capabilities
100
+33
67
Benchmarks
88
+8
81
Pricing
92
-6
98
Context window size
84
+1
83
Recency
38
-8
45
Output Capacity
80
+8
72
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
2 wins
o3 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (32 data points)
o3R1 0528
o3

86.7

current score

Leader

o3

right now

R1 0528

79.4

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o3

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

R1 0528

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.001575
Daily$5.25
Monthly$157.50
Annual$1890.00

R1 0528 saves you $442.50/month

That's $5310.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

74% cheaper
Choose R1 0528 for cost optimization

o3 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
R1 0528 pricing:
Input:$0.50/M tokens
Output:$2.15/M tokens
Winner
o3

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

R1 0528

DeepSeek

79

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico3R1 0528Winner
Overall Score
87
79
o3
Rank#60#88
o3
Quality Rank#60#88
o3
Adoption Rank#60#88
o3
Parameters------
Context Window200K164K
o3
Pricing$2.00/$8.00/M$0.50/$2.15/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
67
o3
Benchmarks
88
81
o3
Pricing
92
98
R1 0528
Context window size
84
83
o3
Recency
38
45
R1 0528
Output Capacity
80
72
o3
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
o3: 10R1 0528: 0
o3
R1 0528
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.3%91.5%
MMLU-Pro
85.8%83.4%
GPQA Diamond
87.7%76%
MATH-500
99%97.8%
HumanEval
97%-
SWE-bench Verified
71.7%57.6%
AIME 2024
96.7%84%
IFEval
92%85.5%
BBH
93%86.5%
Arena Elo
14151380
LiveBench
74.8%69.5%
HLE
30.1%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o3Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #60), placing it in the top 80% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
R1 0528Strong Performer

Scores 79/100 (rank #88), placing it in the top 70% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

o3 has a 7-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o3 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose R1 0528 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
o3
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00
R1 0528Best Value
Input cost$0.50/M tokens
Output cost$2.15/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.033
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$39.75

R1 0528 offers 74% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $39.75/month with R1 0528 vs $150.00/month with o3 - a $110.25 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o3Faster
Speed score0/100
R1 0528
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. R1 0528 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

o3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.15/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

R1 0528

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (87/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3

o3 has a moderate advantage with a 7.299999999999997-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but R1 0528 has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

o3
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Cost - 74% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo3R1 0528
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o3

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

R1 0528

DeepSeek

Best Value
$3.48
estimated monthly cost

R1 0528 saves you $9.72/month

That's 74% cheaper than o3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero3R1 0528
Context Window200K164K
Max Output Tokens100,00032,768
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedApr 16, 2025May 28, 2025
Last updated: 8m ago

相关对比

o3 vs R1 0528 (2026) | LM Market Cap