Palmyra X5 vs Solar Pro 3
| Signal | Palmyra X5 | Delta | Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 17 | -50 | |
Pricing | 94 | -5 | |
Context window size | 96 | +14 | |
Recency | 97 | -1 | |
Output Capacity | 65 | -20 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 5 | 4 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
Palmyra X5
Writer
Solar Pro 3
Upstage
Solar Pro 3 saves you $315.00/month
That's $3780.00/year compared to Palmyra X5 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Palmyra X5 | Solar Pro 3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #291 | #290 | Solar Pro 3 |
| Quality Rank | #291 | #290 | Solar Pro 3 |
| Adoption Rank | #291 | #290 | Solar Pro 3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1040K | 131K | Palmyra X5 |
| Pricing | $0.60/$6.00/M | $0.15/$0.60/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 17 | 67 | Solar Pro 3 |
| Pricing | 94 | 99 | Solar Pro 3 |
| Context window size | 96 | 81 | Palmyra X5 |
| Recency | 97 | 98 | Solar Pro 3 |
| Output Capacity | 65 | 85 | Solar Pro 3 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #291), placing it in the top 0% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #290), placing it in the top 0% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Palmyra X5 when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1040K token context)
Choose Solar Pro 3 when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Agentic applications using tool/function calling
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Solar Pro 3 offers 89% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $11.25/month with Solar Pro 3 vs $99.00/month with Palmyra X5 - a $87.75 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Solar Pro 3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1040K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.60/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Palmyra X5 and Solar Pro 3 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Palmyra X5
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Solar Pro 3
89% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Palmyra X5
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Palmyra X5
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Palmyra X5
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Writer
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Palmyra X5 | Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Palmyra X5
Writer
Solar Pro 3
Upstage
Solar Pro 3 saves you $7.29/month
That's 88% cheaper than Palmyra X5 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Palmyra X5 | Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 131K |
| Max Output Tokens | 8,192 | 131,072 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Jan 21, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 |