Skip to content

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Solar Pro 3

Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

40#289
vs
Solar Pro 3

Upstage

40#290
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalQwen3 Coder NextDeltaSolar Pro 3
Capabilities
50
-17
67
Pricing
99
0
99
Context window size
86
+5
81
Recency
99
+2
98
Output Capacity
90
+5
85
Overall Result
3 wins
of 5
2 wins
Qwen3 Coder Next wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
Qwen3 Coder NextSolar Pro 3
Qwen3 Coder Next

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Solar Pro 3

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

Per request$0.000520
Daily$1.73
Monthly$52.00
Annual$624.00

Solar Pro 3

Upstage

Best Value
Per request$0.000450
Daily$1.50
Monthly$45.00
Annual$540.00

Solar Pro 3 saves you $7.00/month

That's $84.00/year compared to Qwen3 Coder Next at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

13% cheaper
Choose Solar Pro 3 for cost optimization

Qwen3 Coder Next pricing:
Input:$0.12/M tokens
Output:$0.80/M tokens
Solar Pro 3 pricing:
Input:$0.15/M tokens
Output:$0.60/M tokens
Tie
Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

40

Composite Score

Tie
Solar Pro 3

Upstage

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricQwen3 Coder NextSolar Pro 3Winner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#289#290
Qwen3 Coder Next
Quality Rank#289#290
Qwen3 Coder Next
Adoption Rank#289#290
Qwen3 Coder Next
Parameters------
Context Window262K131K
Qwen3 Coder Next
Pricing$0.12/$0.80/M$0.15/$0.60/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
67
Solar Pro 3
Pricing
99
99
Solar Pro 3
Context window size
86
81
Qwen3 Coder Next
Recency
99
98
Qwen3 Coder Next
Output Capacity
90
85
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Qwen3 Coder NextEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #289), placing it in the top 1% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Solar Pro 3Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #290), placing it in the top 0% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Qwen3 Coder Next when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (262K token context)
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Solar Pro 3 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Qwen3 Coder Next
Input cost$0.12/M tokens
Output cost$0.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.023
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$13.80
Solar Pro 3Best Value
Input cost$0.15/M tokens
Output cost$0.60/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.019
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$11.25

Solar Pro 3 offers 18% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $11.25/month with Solar Pro 3 vs $13.80/month with Qwen3 Coder Next - a $2.55 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Qwen3 Coder NextFaster
Speed score0/100
Solar Pro 3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Qwen3 Coder Next

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Solar Pro 3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Qwen3 Coder Next

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3 Coder Next

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.60/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Solar Pro 3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Qwen3 Coder Next
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next and Solar Pro 3 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Qwen3 Coder Next
Recommended

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Upstage

  • Choose for Cost - 18% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityQwen3 Coder NextSolar Pro 3
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

$1.18
estimated monthly cost

Solar Pro 3

Upstage

Best Value
$0.9900
estimated monthly cost

Solar Pro 3 saves you $0.1860/month

That's 16% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterQwen3 Coder NextSolar Pro 3
Context Window262K131K
Max Output Tokens262,144131,072
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedFeb 4, 2026Jan 27, 2026
Last updated: 24m ago

相关对比

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Solar Pro 3 (2026) | LM Market Cap