Skip to content

DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek

69#107
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalDeepSeek V3DeltaQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Capabilities
50
-17
67
Benchmarks
70
+1
69
Pricing
99
+0
99
Context window size
73
-4
77
Recency
30
-49
79
Output Capacity
70
0
70
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
4 wins
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (22 data points)
DeepSeek V3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
DeepSeek V3

69

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

69

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.000600
Daily$2.00
Monthly$60.02
Annual$720.30

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Alibaba

Per request$0.000640
Daily$2.13
Monthly$64.00
Annual$768.00

DeepSeek V3 saves you $3.97/month

That's $47.70/year compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

6% cheaper
Choose DeepSeek V3 for cost optimization

DeepSeek V3 pricing:
Input:$0.20/M tokens
Output:$0.80/M tokens
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct pricing:
Input:$0.20/M tokens
Output:$0.88/M tokens
Tie
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek

69

Composite Score

Tie
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Alibaba

69

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricDeepSeek V3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructWinner
Overall Score
69
69
--
Rank#107#106
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Quality Rank#107#106
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Adoption Rank#107#106
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Parameters--235B--
Context Window131K262K
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Pricing$0.20/$0.80/M$0.20/$0.88/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
67
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarks
70
69
DeepSeek V3
Pricing
99
99
DeepSeek V3
Context window size
73
77
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Recency
30
79
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Output Capacity
70
70
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmark Head-to-Head(13 benchmarks)
DeepSeek V3: 0Qwen3 VL: 1
DeepSeek V3
Qwen3 VL
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
88.5%-
MMLU-Pro
75.9%-
GPQA Diamond
59.1%-
MATH-500
90.2%-
HumanEval
82.6%-
SWE-bench Verified
42%-
AIME 2024
39.2%-
GSM8K
96.7%-
IFEval
87.1%-
BBH
87.5%-
Arena Elo
13181415
LiveBench
60.4%-
BigCodeBench
50%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

DeepSeek V3Competitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #107), placing it in the top 63% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructCompetitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #106), placing it in the top 64% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose DeepSeek V3 when you need:

  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (262K token context)
  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
DeepSeek V3Best Value
Input cost$0.20/M tokens
Output cost$0.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.014
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$15.00
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input cost$0.20/M tokens
Output cost$0.88/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.016
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$16.20

DeepSeek V3 offers 7% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $15.00/month with DeepSeek V3 vs $16.20/month with Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct - a $1.20 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
DeepSeek V3Faster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

DeepSeek V3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. DeepSeek V3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

DeepSeek V3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

DeepSeek V3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (69/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

DeepSeek V3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

DeepSeek V3
Recommended

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 7% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityDeepSeek V3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek

Best Value
$1.32
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Alibaba

$1.42
estimated monthly cost

DeepSeek V3 saves you $0.0955/month

That's 7% cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterDeepSeek V3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Context Window131K262K
Max Output Tokens16,00016,384
Open SourceYesYes
CreatedDec 26, 2024Sep 23, 2025
Last updated: 35m ago

相关对比

DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (2026) | LM Market Cap