| Signal | Nova Pro 1.0 | Delta | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | +17 | |
Pricing | 3 | +3 | |
Context window size | 87 | +11 | |
Recency | 45 | -18 | |
Output Capacity | 62 | -18 | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 5 | 2 wins |
6
days higher
7
days
17
days higher
Amazon
rekaai
Reka Flash 3 saves you $220.00/month
That's $2640.00/year compared to Nova Pro 1.0 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Nova Pro 1.0 | Reka Flash 3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58 | 58 | Reka Flash 3 |
| Rank | #245 | #243 | Reka Flash 3 |
| Quality Rank | #245 | #243 | Reka Flash 3 |
| Adoption Rank | #245 | #243 | Reka Flash 3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 300K | 66K | Nova Pro 1.0 |
| Pricing | $0.80/$3.20/M | $0.10/$0.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 33 | Nova Pro 1.0 |
| Pricing | 3 | 0 | Nova Pro 1.0 |
| Context window size | 87 | 76 | Nova Pro 1.0 |
| Recency | 45 | 63 | Reka Flash 3 |
| Output Capacity | 62 | 80 | Reka Flash 3 |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 58/100 (rank #245), placing it in the top 16% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 58/100 (rank #243), placing it in the top 17% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Reka Flash 3 offers 93% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $4.50/month with Reka Flash 3 vs $60.00/month with Nova Pro 1.0 - a $55.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Reka Flash 3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (300K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (58/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Nova Pro 1.0 and Reka Flash 3 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.09999999999999432 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Nova Pro 1.0
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Reka Flash 3
93% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Nova Pro 1.0
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Nova Pro 1.0
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Nova Pro 1.0
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Amazon
| Capability | Nova Pro 1.0 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Amazon
rekaai
Reka Flash 3 saves you $4.86/month
That's 92% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Nova Pro 1.0 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 300K | 66K |
| Max Output Tokens | 5,120 | 65,536 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Dec 5, 2024 | Mar 12, 2025 |
Reka Flash 3 scores 58/100 (rank #243) compared to Nova Pro 1.0's 58/100 (rank #245), giving it a 0-point advantage. Reka Flash 3 is the stronger overall choice, though Nova Pro 1.0 may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Nova Pro 1.0 is ranked #245 and Reka Flash 3 is ranked #243 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.20/M output tokens vs Nova Pro 1.0's $3.20/M output tokens - 16.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: Nova Pro 1.0 at $0.80/M vs Reka Flash 3 at $0.10/M.
Nova Pro 1.0 has a larger context window of 300,000 tokens compared to Reka Flash 3's 65,536 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.