| Signal | Grok 3 | Delta | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 73 | +1 | |
Pricing | 85 | -12 | |
Context window size | 81 | -14 | |
Recency | 79 | -21 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -65 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
Score History
73.3
current score
MiMo-V2-Pro
right now
73.4
current score
xAI
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro saves you $800.00/month
That's $9600.00/year compared to Grok 3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2-Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 73 | 73 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Rank | #44 | #43 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Quality Rank | #44 | #43 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Adoption Rank | #44 | #43 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 1049K | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Pricing | $3.00/$15.00/M | $1.00/$3.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 67 | Grok 3 |
| Benchmarks | 73 | 73 | Grok 3 |
| Pricing | 85 | 97 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Context window size | 81 | 96 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Recency | 79 | 100 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 85 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 73/100 (rank #44), placing it in the top 85% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 73/100 (rank #43), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
MiMo-V2-Pro offers 78% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $60.00/month with MiMo-V2-Pro vs $270.00/month with Grok 3 - a $210.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. MiMo-V2-Pro also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($3.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (73/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Grok 3 and MiMo-V2-Pro are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.10000000000000853 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Grok 3
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
MiMo-V2-Pro
78% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Grok 3
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Grok 3
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Grok 3
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by xAI
| Capability | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
xAI
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro saves you $18.00/month
That's 77% cheaper than Grok 3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 131,072 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Jun 10, 2025 | Mar 18, 2026 |
MiMo-V2-Pro scores 73/100 (rank #43) compared to Grok 3's 73/100 (rank #44), giving it a 0-point advantage. MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger overall choice, though Grok 3 may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Grok 3 is ranked #44 and MiMo-V2-Pro is ranked #43 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $3.00/M output tokens vs Grok 3's $15.00/M output tokens - 5.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: Grok 3 at $3.00/M vs MiMo-V2-Pro at $1.00/M.
MiMo-V2-Pro has a larger context window of 1,048,576 tokens compared to Grok 3's 131,072 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.